I am not an expert but if WTC was plumbed for gas for heating and cooking then it is very possible there were pockets of gas that came from leaks built up inside of kitchens and furnace rooms.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ET guys are above average, so lets do a 9/11 poll
- Thread starter FutTrd
- Start date
I am not an expert but if WTC was plumbed for gas for heating and cooking then it is very possible there were pockets of gas that came from leaks built up inside of kitchens and furnace rooms.
Quote from gunslinger:
So does it make sense to you...that this whole "massive operation" was compromised because somebody "in the know" wanted to make a few million??? Sorry rat, that just does not make ANY sense.
It was than a few milion. Sure just 5 on the puts, but what about the insurance on TT bought taken out just a few weeks before that had a clause to pay just for terrorism ? What about all of the defense companies that make weapons, tanks etc that just happen to contribute to PACS that support bush and cheney ? I promise you stuff goes down in the CIA that even the president does not knows about.
Quote from FutTrd:
you are all bogged down on money trail, who did what, who was where and when.
but will someone please address the issue of New York Firefighters
there are at least 45 firefighters who say they DID hear explosions in lobby prior to collapse
is this normal, I don't think so.
but if there are any plumbers who turned traders perhaps you can shed light
Youre not seeing the forrest throught the trees. Look at the big picture. If the govt wanted to go into Iraq, there are a lot easier ways to sway the public than to get 1000's involved with a conspiracy.
Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI? You think they were like" well we couldnt get any Iraqis, but we have some Saudis, maybe nobody will notice?"
Quote from ratboy88:
come on... you cant be this slow. if it were arabs, they would have plastered that info on every MSM rag out there. the trail went back to someone they didnt want it to, lets just say it was "sensitive". i am sure these "lucky" put buyers were warned off of collecting their prize.
If it was normal trading, then why were the profits unclaimed ?
You mean to tell me you would just let 5 mill set there for years for no reason at all ? The fact that over 4000 puts were bought so far out of the money so close to expiration. It was only only about 3k that turned into 5 million. Just pure luck ?
Quote from volente_00:
It was than a few milion. Sure just 5 on the puts, but what about the insurance on TT bought taken out just a few weeks before that had a clause to pay just for terrorism ? What about all of the defense companies that make weapons, tanks etc that just happen to contribute to PACS that support bush and cheney ? I promise you stuff goes down in the CIA that even the president does not knows about.
Youre not seeing the forrest throught the trees. Look at the big picture. If the govt wanted to go into Iraq, there are a lot easier ways to sway the public than to get 1000's involved with a conspiracy.
Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI? You think they were like" well we couldnt get any Iraqis, but we have some Saudis, maybe nobody will notice?"
Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI?
Quote from gunslinger:
Youre not seeing the forrest throught the trees. Look at the big picture. If the govt wanted to go into Iraq, there are a lot easier ways to sway the public than to get 1000's involved with a conspiracy.
Besides, something I just dont get, if this was done by the gov't needed for provocation to invade Iraq, WHY WERENT THE HIJACKERS IRAQI? You think they were like" well we couldnt get any Iraqis, but we have some Saudis, maybe nobody will notice?"
Watch the video. They had fake id's fake passports, etc. 9 of the people named are still alive in the middle east. One guy's passport was stolen from a pickpocket before the attack. You saw pictures of the hijackers but i doubt we really know their true identities or places or origin.
Quote from volente_00:
Watch the video. They had fake id's fake passports, etc. 9 of the people named are still alive in the middle east. One guy's passport was stolen from a pickpocket before the attack. You saw pictures of the hijackers but i doubt we really know their true identities or places or origin.
Okay, then why would the govt have the public think theyre saudis? Surely it would make more sense to havethe public know theyre Iraqis
Quote from gunslinger:
Okay, then why would the govt have the public think theyre saudis? Surely it would make more sense to havethe public know theyre Iraqis
according to your assumption then we should have attacked saudi arabia in order to get who is responsible for the attacks. This is about war on the middle east, iraq, afghanistan, iran ?. The attackers were not all saudis so the war can be directed towards multiple areas.
Quote from volente_00:
according to your assumption then we should have attacked saudi arabia in order to get who is responsible for the attacks. This is about war on the middle east, iraq, afghanistan, iran ?. The attackers were not all saudis so the war can be directed towards multiple areas.
What?????????????????????????????????????????????????
The conspiracy is "the US govt staged the WTC attacks so the US would have provocation to invade Iraq" so my question is, why didnt they make the hijackers Iraqi?