Quote from kinggyppo:
central banks, sovereign funds, hedge funds, pension funds, locals/market makers, retail players. I will let you guess who the 800 pound gorilla is. Gmst here is an update on the inverse head and shoulders chart in es.
Quote from gmst:
Thanks kinggyppo for remembering me. Imo, nice illustration but should not be counted, because of the CB intervention.
I think its fair to say that we should count occurences of patterns, if they have been caused by activities of market players. I don't think its correct to count CB liquidity/swaprates/fx spot interventions effects either on ccys charts or equities charts and then say that this and this pattern held.
they,those trading with prior knowledge,have positions also,they all countQuote from gmst:
Thanks kinggyppo for remembering me. Imo, nice illustration but should not be counted, because of the CB intervention.
I think its fair to say that we should count occurences of patterns, if they have been caused by activities of market players. I don't think its correct to count CB liquidity/swaprates/fx spot interventions effects either on ccys charts or equities charts and then say that this and this pattern held.
Quote from kinggyppo:
next you will tell me price got there on low volume, does it matter if you were short, LOL.
But for the sake of good research, I don't think its correct to count occurence of a pattern caused by CB intervention. Its similar to counting a pattern if it showed up, lets say after Sep 11.Quote from gmst:
no i won't say that. I will count low volume since it was pre-market.But for the sake of good research, I don't think its correct to count occurence of a pattern caused by CB intervention. Its similar to counting a pattern if it showed up, lets say after Sep 11.
Btw i was short from 96, and stopped myself at 1206 after CNY reserve rate cut. So got saved from this massacre somewhat.