ES Journal Archive (2011)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from kinggyppo:

central banks, sovereign funds, hedge funds, pension funds, locals/market makers, retail players. I will let you guess who the 800 pound gorilla is. Gmst here is an update on the inverse head and shoulders chart in es.

Thanks kinggyppo for remembering me. Imo, nice illustration but should not be counted, because of the CB intervention.

I think its fair to say that we should count occurences of patterns, if they have been caused by activities of market players. I don't think its correct to count CB liquidity/swaprates/fx spot interventions effects either on ccys charts or equities charts and then say that this and this pattern held.
 
Quote from gmst:

Thanks kinggyppo for remembering me. Imo, nice illustration but should not be counted, because of the CB intervention.

I think its fair to say that we should count occurences of patterns, if they have been caused by activities of market players. I don't think its correct to count CB liquidity/swaprates/fx spot interventions effects either on ccys charts or equities charts and then say that this and this pattern held.

next you will tell me price got there on low volume, does it matter if you were short, LOL.
 
Quote from gmst:

Thanks kinggyppo for remembering me. Imo, nice illustration but should not be counted, because of the CB intervention.

I think its fair to say that we should count occurences of patterns, if they have been caused by activities of market players. I don't think its correct to count CB liquidity/swaprates/fx spot interventions effects either on ccys charts or equities charts and then say that this and this pattern held.
they,those trading with prior knowledge,have positions also,they all count
 
Quote from kinggyppo:

next you will tell me price got there on low volume, does it matter if you were short, LOL.

no i won't say that. I will count low volume since it was pre-market. :) But for the sake of good research, I don't think its correct to count occurence of a pattern caused by CB intervention. Its similar to counting a pattern if it showed up, lets say after Sep 11.

Btw i was short from 96, and stopped myself at 1206 after CNY reserve rate cut. So got saved from this massacre somewhat.
 
Quote from gmst:

no i won't say that. I will count low volume since it was pre-market. :) But for the sake of good research, I don't think its correct to count occurence of a pattern caused by CB intervention. Its similar to counting a pattern if it showed up, lets say after Sep 11.

Btw i was short from 96, and stopped myself at 1206 after CNY reserve rate cut. So got saved from this massacre somewhat.

so you lost 10 es points but it doesn't count, I don't get it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top