Quote from Picaso:
(I don't trade lots of 20s)
Fix your size at 3 cars.
Determine a % increase in your equity that will trigger adding 1 car.
When you reach it trade with 4. If you go below x equity, you reduce one car. If you go above y, you add one car.
Rinse. Repeat.
Going from 1 to 2 and from 2 to 3 is hardest. 3 to 5 still hard. Then it gets much easier. 1 to 2: 100% increase in P&L. 2 to 3: 50% increase... 5 to 6: 20%... 10 to 11: 10%, etc.
Once you go past a high number of cars (not there yet myself![]()
), simply go for a parallel increase/decrease % of cars as percentage of equity. I.e. When my trading equity increases/decreases 10%, I will add/reduce 10% contracts.
And always make sure you take some off the table.

Quote from Laissez Faire:
I would not want to argue with the statistician and you are absolutely right.
A gap fill certainly does not seem like a stretch, I just thought it was odd we did not do it earlier and formed a double top.
Recent average range is a little over 20 and this one is currently 17 and a inside day.
Would be very cool with a gap fill above or a slide below to 30.
Unfortunately, I fear that we may be stuck here.
Quote from GordonTheGekko:
Does anybody watch SPY instead of the ES because SPY is a little ahead (less than a second!) the ES?
Quote from Laissez Faire:
7 points, 11 minutes. Still hope, Tomahawk?
This time, I`m observing that ES tested it`s old highs while NQ is still below the opening range. Not too promising.![]()


)