Elon at court

The judge took the easy way out and ordered the parties to make an agreement between them in 2 weeks. Nobody wants to be responsible to pop Tesla's balloon.

https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/05/tesla-elon-musk-sec-tweets/

""I have great respect for Judge Nathan, and I'm pleased with her decision today. The tweet in question was true, immaterial to shareholders, and in no way a violation of my agreement."

1. Nope, it was not true, Tesla is not on its way making 500K cars. The tweet was so untrue it was even corrected in a few hours. (he meant 500K average production speed (so 10K/week) by end of year)

2. Yes he was violating the agreement because tweeter sitter didn't OK the tweet first.

3. It was not immaterial to share holders. Production numbers are very material.

Otherwise he is right...I mean ambient with red wine is the shit...
 
mlawson71 said:
It was a really rotten thing he did with that tweet, out of wounded ego.
More...

One tweet would be kind of OK, men quarreling between each other. But this dumbass doubled down when he was called on his accusation, challenged the guy to sue him and even hired a PI to dig up dirt on him.

That is Trump level of assholeness...

Anyhow, for our entertainment, day #2:

https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/5/...-unsworth-tweet-humiliated-dirtied-defamation

"another email from Birchall (Musk's employee) to Howard. “We would like you to immediately move forward with ‘leaking’ this information to the UK press,” the email reads. Bullet points follow, containing false information about Unsworth"

Nice...
 
Last edited:
Frankly, I, personally, find even one tweet insinuating what he insinuated about that man to be unacceptable. That is a very serious accusation to make without any proof to back it up, especially when it's provoked, as you said, by people just quarreling.
I had no idea about the PI part or his attempts to leak false information, that is just wild. What was he thinking?!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top