I'm not hinting they were "targeted". They're heavily represented in retail and the service sector, the first to go.Quote from CoolTraderDude:
My bad...
I was expecting you to quickly point out racism the way everyone else does... Let's face it... That's what the argument would come down to...
EDIT: It is rising for black females but falling for black males. It is also falling for white males but stays relatively unchanged for white females.
You started out saying that they're (blacks) incomes were disproportionately hit (during the recession, hinting that they were somewhat targeted) which happens to be true for black males only because black females actually rose in income.
By percentage it's a wash...
Edit: "It is rising for black females but falling for black males." It is? The data I linked to shows real incomes since 1950 more than doubled for "black" males and tripled for females, substantially better growth than for "whites". Maybe I'm reading the table wrong...
