once again, thunderdog, WHY DON"T YOU ASK MR. WILLIAMS YOURSELF? he answers his own phone or you can email him.
http://www.ireallytrade.com/contactlarry.htm
surfer
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Elite Professional Trading Seminar
- Thread starter jmiles301
- Start date
once again, thunderdog, WHY DON"T YOU ASK MR. WILLIAMS YOURSELF? he answers his own phone or you can email him.
http://www.ireallytrade.com/contactlarry.htm
surfer
Because that was not the question I specifically asked you to answer in your reply. Are you dull? You hyperlinked a book wherein he uses COT and you recommended it. I asked you when was the last time you made money per Williams's methods using the COT report. Are you experiencing cognitive challenges?Quote from marketsurfer:
once again, thunderdog, WHY DON"T YOU ASK MR. WILLIAMS YOURSELF? he answers his own phone or you can email him.
http://www.ireallytrade.com/contactlarry.htm
surfer
Would you kindly answer two things for me? First, what is the formula Williams uses for sharing winning profits with seminar attendees? And second, what was the amount of that check in relation to the cost of that seminar?Quote from trainr:
...In the last one, he sent me a check as a percentage of his winning profits from the seminar trading.
Quote from Thunderdog:
Because that was not the question I specifically asked you to answer in your reply. Are you dull? You hyperlinked a book wherein he uses COT and you recommended it. I asked you when was the last time you made money per Williams's methods using the COT report. Are you experiencing cognitive challenges?
yes, i have made money using the COT report based on larry's concepts.
once again, for the third time, ask larry yourself about the seminar sharing of profits and gallachers allegations. you will be surprised about the gallacher, i know i was.
surfer
Interestingly, you never reported it in your journal. I don't ever recall your referencing the COT in connection with your various "death channels," gann squares and such. It was NEVER presented as a consideration or basis of any of your reported trades here at ET. Please correct me if I am wrong.Quote from marketsurfer:
yes, i have made money using the COT report based on larry's concepts.
Interesting. Perhaps Larry does not pursue Gallacher because he knows a bit about the law. In any event, Gallacher's clarion call seems to have fallen mostly on deaf ears anyway. I think Williams relies on undiscerning dreamers (and pitches his hype accordingly) rather than on discriminating investors/traders. He seems to know his market very well indeed.Quote from trainr:
..Larry has a law degree so legal action is something with which he is familiar, but being as classy as he is, I don't think he deigns to answer his idiotic critics who know nothing about him. He's also a bit weary from the attacks. I don't think he cares who attacks him anymore.
I've been to his home in the same gated community as Ray Kroc's widow, and met his family. Meaning, I know a little bit more than the average guy about him.
As for your allusions to his wealth, I have no doubt that he is a rich man for the simple reason that there are many stupid people in this world. That is all any unscrupulous person needs. Ken Lay is (was?) also rich. Unfortunately, that has little bearing on the financial well-being of his clients or shareholders.
As an aside, I am still waiting for the profit payout formula Mr. Williams uses for his seminar winnings, and what proportion of your actual seminar cost was offset by that profit sharing check that you proudly referred to.
Quote from Grob109:
Were I you I would try to locate such a possibilty. Word of mouth is the common way since these events are not advertised. One of the benefits is that you will be able to network with people of like mind and skills.
Grob,
I, for one, think you should give a seminar. I would also be the first one to sign up for it, regardless of price.
Of course, all attendees would have to drop the obligatory hit of acid just to figure out what's going on.
Probably be the best trading seminar anyone has ever been to though. We can have it in Amsterdam.
Quote from trainr:
No difference, except the lack of profit split. And, you've never done independent investigation.
trainr,
i share your views on larry williams, thank you. however, there is much difference--- the person you refer to claims to never have a losing day trading among other claims. larry does not makes these types of statements.
best,
surfer
Quote from Thunderdog:
Interesting. Perhaps Larry does not pursue Gallacher because he knows a bit about the law.
NOTE: Pure speculation on your part, and not worth addressing.
However, I'm familiar with a number of lawsuits to which he has been a party (all of which he won), and I know he gets tired of the drain.
In any event, Gallacher's clarion call seems to have fallen mostly on deaf ears anyway.
Let's speculate on the reason: people recognize Gallacher's hype for what it is. (My speculation -- equally relevant to yours, at the least.)
See NOTE.As for your allusions to his wealth, I have no doubt that he is a rich man for the simple reason that there are many stupid people in this world.
I expect you to provide some indication that you have done some independent investigation of Mr. Williams. As soon as you provide that, I'll answer your question.As an aside, I am still waiting for the profit payout formula Mr. Williams uses for his seminar winnings, and what proportion of your actual seminar cost was offset by that profit sharing check that you proudly referred to.
Fair enough?
I'm not sure if I should comment. I'm sure you're a great guy. Without me giving it away, can you spot any logical fallacy in your statement?Quote from marketsurfer:
i share your views on larry williams, thank you. however, there is much difference--- the person you refer to claims to never have a losing day trading among other claims.
I don't see any difference in the quality of detraction by you or Thunderdog. Do you see why? How do either of you know the claims of your targets, except by hearsay?
Whatever.
I give up.