What constitutes "independent investigation?" Spending thousands of dollars on his seminars? Do you think I am daft? As I wrote in an earlier post, I read portions of a few of his books in bookstores from time to time. (They have couches there, you know.) I saw his books for the pieces of shit that they were and therefore chose to to further enrich him at my expense by buying them. As I indicated earlier, everything of his I have read and come across is tired and uninspired. But the hype he wraps it in in truly the mark of a dream merchant. Further, I have seen a fair amount of his advertising since, for some reason, I had inadvertently gotten onto his mailing list some years ago. (I think that may have had something to do with my previous broker.) In my estimation, his promotional material is geared to an audience with fairly room temperature IQs. So I will ask you again, what constitutes "independent investigation?"Quote from trainr:
NOTE: Pure speculation on your part, and not worth addressing.
However, I'm familiar with a number of lawsuits to which he has been a party (all of which he won), and I know he gets tired of the drain. [/b]
Let's speculate on the reason: people recognize Gallacher's hype for what it is. (My speculation -- equally relevant to yours, at the least.)[/b]See NOTE.I expect you to provide some indication that you have done some independent investigation of Mr. Williams. As soon as you provide that, I'll answer your question.
Fair enough? [/B]
And as for your reluctance to candidly and immediately answer my two simple questions, I will have to conclude that the individual payout numbers in relation to the seminar costs are fairly negligible and are just that much more hype on top of his other puffery ("Keys to the Kingdom," etc., ad infinitum).

