Election 2024 Foreplay

Buy1Sell2 said:
There is a major cognitive, patriotic, and energetic difference between the two.
More...


Your spectrum disorder affects your decision making.... trump and biden are both past their prime old men who are not fit to serve as president anymore...

Trump incorrectly said Viktor Orbán, the prime minister of Hungary, was the prime minister of Turkey...

During a summit in Washington, DC, Trump claimed that Biden could “plunge the world into World War II” – which ended nearly 80 years ago...

During a rally in South Carolina in September, Trump confused former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, one of Trump’s 2016 GOP rivals, with his brother, former President George W. Bush...

Trump appeared to mix up Biden and former President Barack Obama, saying he was ahead of Obama in the 2024 election polls.




Yeah Biden is the only one with Cognitive issues haha
 
El OchoCinco said:
Your spectrum disorder affects your decision making.... trump and biden are both past their prime old men who are not fit to serve as president anymore...

Trump incorrectly said Viktor Orbán, the prime minister of Hungary, was the prime minister of Turkey...

During a summit in Washington, DC, Trump claimed that Biden could “plunge the world into World War II” – which ended nearly 80 years ago...

During a rally in South Carolina in September, Trump confused former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, one of Trump’s 2016 GOP rivals, with his brother, former President George W. Bush...

Trump appeared to mix up Biden and former President Barack Obama, saying he was ahead of Obama in the 2024 election polls.




Yeah Biden is the only one with Cognitive issues haha
More...
the revolutionary army stormed the airports too. Joe's issue is he's not hopped on uppers 24/7 like Dump so he doesn't engage in stream of consciousness logorrhea from which you can ignore constant flubs like Dump. Plus no cult of personality around Joe.
 
Last edited:
UsualName said:
On topic and off topic, Larry Hogan is running for the senate in Maryland and automatically becomes the front runner…

https://twitter.com/x/status/1755998920981799338
More...

Hogan can't be trusted. He will run as a pub to be able to instantly get on the ballot. But will declare himself independent. Maybe even caucus as a dem as the other independents do.

The best pubs can hope for is that he will keep the R after his name to help form a majority. But that would be asking a lot from him.
 
Oh Man, this Biden special prosecutor disaster is turning into the gift that just keeps on giving.

It just keeps getting excellenter and excellenter.

Now Kamala is accusing the special prosecutor (ie. Joe's Justice Department) of being political hacks.

I guess this business of appointing special prosecutors is not working out so well for them. That kind of persecution is supposed to be for ruining Donald Trump. HOW DARE YOU!!!

I don't know. Kamala is questioning the rule of law and the official institutions. That sounds insurrectionist to me. Need to get her off the ballot.

(Note that this article below is FACTUALLY INCORRECT. The special prosecutor did not "clear Biden of wrongdoing." He clearly identified and outlined wrongdoing but said he would not prosecute because the defendant is too fragile. Big difference.)

Harris slams ‘politically motivated’ special counsel report that questioned Biden’s memory

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...counsel-report-that-questioned-bidens-memory/
 
Last edited:
Those of you who may have seen any snippets of white house commentary or lefty media commentary of Kamala commentary will have noted that the script making the rounds in the leftysphere is that the special prosecutor's comments in his report about Joe were "gratuitous." That is the operative word that all lefties must use if they are following the script. If this were are drinking game, I would be flat on my arse drunk from hearing that word repetitively.

But the real issue is that ....no it was not "gratuitious" and unnecessary political talk. The document providing the designation of the special counsel and describing his duties specifically said that he was authorized to make findings and bring charges if necessary but that he had to specify the charges and give detailed reasons. BUT it also said that if he declined to bring any charges that he had to explaine and outline the reasons for the declinations. THUS, the prosecutor was required to list his reasoning for declinations and he did that. He said he was not doiing it because he could not get a conviction due to the mental state of the defendant. That was his reasoning, and he was required under the terms of his appointment to state what his reasoning was. It does not matter whether anyone agrees with him or not. That is the purpose of requiring him to state it so that others can agree, disagree, or simply be informed. BOOM!

Had he not stated his reasoning, it would have made things even worse. Then there would be an appearance that special counsel made findings but did not bring charges due to political interference from the white house or two-tiered system or whatever. And that would not have been pretty either.
 
GF5unrAWgAAlLMi.jpg
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Those of you who may have seen any snippets of white house commentary or lefty media commentary of Kamala commentary will have noted that the script making the rounds in the leftysphere is that the special prosecutor's comments in his report about Joe were "gratuitous." That is the operative word that all lefties must use if they are following the script. If this were are drinking game, I would be flat on my arse drunk from hearing that word repetitively.

But the real issue is that ....no it was not "gratuitious" and unnecessary political talk. The document providing the designation of the special counsel and describing his duties specifically said that he was authorized to make findings and bring charges if necessary but that he had to specify the charges and give detailed reasons. BUT it also said that if he declined to bring any charges that he had to explaine and outline the reasons for the declinations. THUS, the prosecutor was required to list his reasoning for declinations and he did that. He said he was not doiing it because he could not get a conviction due to the mental state of the defendant. That was his reasoning, and he was required under the terms of his appointment to state what his reasoning was. It does not matter whether anyone agrees with him or not. That is the purpose of requiring him to state it so that others can agree, disagree, or simply be informed. BOOM!

Had he not stated his reasoning, it would have made things even worse. Then there would be an appearance that special counsel made findings but did not bring charges due to political interference from the white house or two-tiered system or whatever. And that would not have been pretty either.
More...

My first question was indeed "is this a partisan hack"? And while he may indeed be partisan, he appears to be no hack. Garland should've gone w/a dem non-hack:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_K._Hur

Hur has made donations to the campaigns of a number of Republican political candidates.[16]

On November 1, 2017, Hur was nominated by President Donald Trump to be the next United States Attorney for the District of Maryland.[6] On March 22, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by voice vote.[7] He was confirmed by voice vote later the same day.[8] He was sworn in on April 9, 2018.[9]

After law school, Hur was a law clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 2001 to 2002, then for Chief Justice William Rehnquist of the Supreme Court from 2002 to 2003.[2]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top