Is this for all optionable securities?
No idea. Just snapshot was presented in Daily Shot.
Is this for all optionable securities?
hey guys, I have been busy with working on a database this week, only did 2 trades all week, I will most likely not be trading often until I am near close to finishing it. But I noticed an HD trade that looks pretty juicy. short Feb22/Mar1 calendar. Feb22 vol is 18% and Mar1 is 27.2% This puts the expected move at 4.3% which is extremely expensive. Current 185 short calendar is marked at $2.3. Here is the last 10 moves for HD.
It hasn't even moved close to 4.3%. Vol will most likely come in before earnings
-0.24%
-0.54%
-1.62%
-0.14%
1.64%
-2.65%
0.59%
1.41%
-2.56%
-0.61%
-2.47%
Hi @TheBigShort
Thanks for this thread. Hi have no experience trading earnings but trying to understand what you guys are looking for.
Looking at the HD numbers I don't understand why the expected earnings move is 4.3% . It seems that is 4.3 points, dollars, and that is
a much less % move.
You say the expected move is expensive compared with the previous realized moves. It seems that a short straddle could be the logical play
when something is expensive, but you talk about shorting a calendar . Why, what do you expect ?
thank you for sharing you experience.
Hey raf, I'm curious to know where are you getting the $4.3 earnings move? The calendar is a relative value play. You want to isolate the event volatility (implied move). To do this you take a long and short position on the ambient vol (the vol leading up into earnings) hence the calendar. @destriero posted a long calendar example in this thread where he was long the implied jump. In this case we are short the implied jump.
The math was posted in an excel sheet above and for a better understanding of it, you can read volatility trading by euan sinclair and trading volatility by collin bennet. There is also an excellent paper written by 2 columbia students (just type event volatility columbia pdf on google and you should find it).
If you just short the straddle (totally logical) you are now taking a view on ambient vol and implied move. In this case looking at Garch, Yang.Zhang 10/20, implied vol of .18 for feb22 seemed fair to cheap. If feb22 had been like 23 and Mar1 been 33, I would have shorted the straddle outright. Hope that helps
thanks @TheBigShort
The diference in price from the first week to the second is 1.20 , and that is with no earnings . From the second to the third is 4.66 , earnings in this week.
And from the third to the fourth is 0.95
So , what is the earnings expected move ? aprox 4,5 dollars in one direction, a 2,4 % move . It's very quick and dirty. Possibly wrong.
If you short a calendar you are expecting that the difference in iv between the front and the back will reduce before the end of the front week. So probably you think that the front week iv will incresae and the back week iv will stay. Is that right , what makes you think that ?
I have to think about it, I thought that short calendars were forbidden in ET.
Thank you for the explanation and for the sheet.
Hey guys, I think there is about to be a short squeeze in THS. Insiders have been picking up alot of shares the past month, skew is is really starting to favour the call side and short int ratio just hit 10. I hope this finds some of you before market close
Barely moved around earnings. Must have been a nice trade! Do you know of any company hardhearted in Green Bay Appleton WI that might be looking at buying this company? This area is suddenly showing some interest in the company. Data is in percentiles not actual views.I had short straddle as earnings play on this one. It had amazing turnaround after the earnings.
I had short straddle as earnings play on this one. It had amazing turnaround after the earnings.
I would love to hear your reasoning for the trade Neww.I was short the earnings too.