Friday / December 4, 2020 / 7:30 AM PST
I have one old client who continues to contact me with projects to work on (even though I am no longer actively seeking independent contractor work) so I haven't had a lot of time to trade lately. However, I wanted to note that though I have the same relative information (i.e., measurements) plotted on all my setups, I nonetheless find it helpful to trade using one-, five-,
and fifteen-minute charts, because the different time frames offer differing perspectives, even though they are all using what are essentially the same corresponding settings.
Performance results for the last 24-hour market cycle:
I feel like this helps to add accuracy to the decision-making process. However, it seems to me that anything beyond fifteen minutes lacks the precision required unless one does not mind bouncing in and out of profitability, which I have no desire to do.
I made similar trades in my Forex.com account, which includes a bunch of "Spread Costs" in the performance results, even if they amount to 0.00, which adds a bunch of horizontal lines to the chart. (P.S. The above results were from my OANDA account.)
To me, this seems like a kind of stupid way to report results, because it looks like I made nearly 17 trades when I made only six. (The results from my Ally Trading account use this same [silly] format.)