Duref Mudgins Invites Jack Hershey to Reminisce

Status
Not open for further replies.
So much mumbo jumbo. Trading is easy. What's funny is that after years and years of watching (and in some cases participating) in these over-complicated schemes I woke up one day and for whatever reason, the light bulb of clarity went off in my head.

Since that day, I have never had a losing trading session again and believe me I had plenty before that (blew up two accounts totaling over 55K). Just observing price action over and over is the key I believe. I also attribute my constant pursuit of succeeding and never accepting loss as the main reason.

Success was not without loss however, as I mentioned the monetary forfeiture there was also relationship(s) that were lost too, but I figure they weren't worth it anyhow since they (the women) didn't have any faith in my endeavors.

To anyone that has the resolve to win in this business you have to be able to never accept defeat just like any other process. Paper trade until you have 30 days of success would be the minimum benchmark I would think.
 
Quote from romanus:

Before we talk about his dementia first lets list all his aliases:

Trader28
T280
damnit
antichrist
plodder
mangod
feckle
trois
spiderpig28
dalaialama
lastcall
TheKryptoKid
IQ146
commander guy
allenhobs

I'm sure I've missed like 50 aliases
More...

I am sure you're mistaken with the above aliases !!! Shouldn't we be talking about your dementia?
 
Quote from Joe Doaks:

Doli, you didn't have the military science background to get a passport to the labs in New Mexico or Alabama? A pity. The best pork barrel living there is. Been doing it for over 40 years now, plan to drop in the traces. Das Amerika, as your countryman said. You can tell from this thread that we are a race of madmen. My own excuse is that my first ancestor here arrived in luxury on a King's prison ship for a double indenture (14 years) thanks to the ineffable wisdom of the Crown Transportation Acts. At least I'm not an Aussie.
More...
Oh, I've got enough technical background. It was Eva Peron drew me there. She gave me a big estancia.
 
Quote from I am...:

"I am" is really a singularity, and not a plurality. Oneness is the truth, whereas, multiplicity is a conceptual anti-truth. So, "I am because we are" is pretty much non-sense. Taken serioiusly, however, it can build an alternative world in the mind of "I am". "I think, therefore I am..." is closer to the truth. The concept of plurality is a thought of one thinker. That thought is expressed as what I sometimes call "this world". It is populated with thoughts which credit themselves with the ability to think. Whereas oneness is a known, plurality explores the unknown. Exploration of the unknown involves a learning process not native to the realm of knowledge where "I am" is at home.

There is no such thing as learning in the realm of knowledge where oneness is and remains reality. Learning is a process associated with an unreal realm which I will call consciousness. Consciousness allows a perciever to see what he wishes, regardless of truth. Consciousness allows the idea of multiplicity to appear real, making it "the truth" for the perciever. As a perciever wishes, he sees. As he sees, he "believes". As wishing continues, value-judgments alter what is seen, and "learning" proceeds. Learning the concept of plurality/multiplicity produces this world. It is problematic so there is another effort to appeal to more learning as a kind of salvation. This has been ruinous for Duref Mudgins which has split into 18 aliases in dealing with it. Likewise, all aliases in the world derive from a learing process tracing back to the "birth" of consciousness.

Jesus
More...

Your comments point out that you are bound (have a boundary) that is just totally ego centric. This is dumb, stupid and ignorant.

What has happened over the years is that an algorithm has been offered. If and when anyone decided to use it and pass it forward it turned out that the algorithm spread to other areas. In time copying was invented, the PC came into being, APL's were set up so produce software languages, and programming became part of formal ducation. The algorithm blended these things into it's use and passing forward. So you see practitioners, the system of the algorithm in many forms (mostly human mind poer and electronic); this is described as five generations of peoplein three words: "because we are".

As a consequence of this, the algorithm and its use becoming practical to 1 out of 5 people who consider it (See silly to complex polls which get the approximately same result), my persona became associated with the algorithm and that is where the first two words come from: "I am".

Doc used it as his theme with the Celtics for two years. His coaching mantra is that the team of individuals could come together and manifest a playing style and strategy that would exceed the competition. It does as you have seen by how the Lakers and everyone else before that were wiped out. the last game was a culminating manifestation.

For the algorithm, it is coming into it's own and is now global and in its fifth generation of users. as you see it is beginning to rub up against the CW and because the CW is deeply ingrained in the financial industry, the CW practitioners will always find safety in the CW of the financial industry. You are a stray example of ego centricity and you cannot entertain any thinking at this point just as 80% of those who look at the algorithm cannot. It is especially unsatisfactory to greedy entrepreneur types.

You appeared here, for example because of the overlap of the words that came from a search. without reading the thread you posted your mantra as yet another egocentric replay.

There is no connection between the african expression and your mantra.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from jack hershey:

The five stages recently posted is what I am about.

"ubuntu" is an african word that stands for "I am, because we are" The coach of the Celtics also is of this persuasion.

This thread is typical od one that is not of my choosing nor orientation. I recognize that there is a swarm of misinformed detractors who have the need to vent and react to what I represent.

Because my life's experience has been as an advocate of process learning, I do recognize that to get people to think can be a challenge because they have chosen to have their mind's built in a context of content "teaching", which is doubly improperly invasive.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


What made you an advocate of process learning?

There are many issues with the medium here, I would imagine.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I adopted it when I joined the Boy Scouts and got involved in the merit badge program. A scout a few years ahead of me was taking physics in school; ofr that year I coached him on the subject and his homework.

This led to my being excused from physics and biology in formal classes in high school. I did a couple of years of work/study in organic chemistry to fill in my schedule as a solo study hall in the chem lab. I did Tesla for science fairs and DC amplifier design for precursors to what became stereo (hi hi fi)

Years before Earth Day and the environment being named the environment, in my social life (NYSR) I was offered funding by Ford to deal with "what's wrong out there". There are many implications of havinng the "seed" grant from Ford to begin what became known as the institutionalization of the environmental movement.

So I wedged environmental education into the formal learning process. To fast track this, I subverted the pedagodgy of formal education. On Wall Street, I'm sure there are those who remember the iron fence being taken down at the place where G. Washington was innogerated. On Wednesday's you may also remember who introduced the entertainers on the portable stage that was set up. That was me, I commissioned the original plays and music that got those who filled the streets to learn about america and the environment. Before that you may recall the 29 October serenading from the NYSE floor to the gallery annually. Or maybe the Musuems Collaborative annual environemntal dinners inside the Treasury Building where the fence had been removed.

All the informal and formal education in that era was process oriented to get the environment institutionalized in the fabric of NYC and its 5 boroughs and 29 school districts.

The medium here is what it is. There is not an understanding as yet as to what is involved in creating trading algorithms. Comunications in the financial industry vis a vis science is as yet an unborne aspect of the financial industry. For some reason there is an urge on the industry's part to stay small by thinking they are keeping secrets and keeping control by focusing on fringe money of fees and commissions and doing deals.
 
What makes my writing poor to readers is it's out of the box algorithmic basis relative to the CW algoritms. This is further screwed up by the fact that I do not think in CW thought processes. The band aids of CW definitely outweigh the poor principles. Back to understanding me. There are about three time periods of digestion: 48 hours, two weeks and six months.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I don't understand the last sentence of this paragraph. Could you please elaborate?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


People have inputs. They digest what comes into them.

This is bcause of the ratio of the conscious to unconscious (10,000/20,000,000 units per sensing cycle.)

The advent of the computer makes data flow a tangible to many people in terms of bandwith (See Braithwaite).

I make statements, largely in what is characterized as a foreign language. The unconscious reception of these is fairly annoying in the "shoot the messenger" sense. many people avoid my posts and some people cannot read them (See Lizard syndrome).

Turning one's eyes away from a post because it will be unsettling (See current torture testimony in senate) is a common survival reaction.

But those who do read are subject to the mind's prosessing and how the mind grows psyiologically. Sleep is where a lot of the unconscious input is redistributed into theads in the mind as reinforcing cords that interlace the mind's various segemented operating systems. This takes time and it is especially slow when a person's mind is somewhat dissorganized.

While at EOP, I made it a point to have my shepard log the reaction time of agencies and individuals of power who played roles. I was subject to the red felt modus in several admins so I had to have timing knowledge and defensive skills. At EOP, climate change was faster than processing so gaming had to be very flexible.

You can see that many people do not "get it" vis a vis the algorithm. You can see how strategies of detractors here are quite lagging and sluggish and mostly superphishal regarding being triggered by key words in my test. Watch thunderdog especially.

The warp and woofing of learners, people at inquiry and detractors is quite an exercise. You can see several blasts of four digit dragon posts on some days. We speak at over 100 WPM.

trader 666 failed to respond for several months to my first shot on unusual volume. Lately he runs over two weeks in arrears on the unusual volume. So yesterday, I moved into the 48 hour redundancy to keep his subconscious and unconscious mind looping on making money at about 3% a day.

In CW it is severely embedded that entry and exit have no relationship. You see that others are now scoring how many times Trader666 has treid unsuccessfully to ignore the connection of entry and exit. His latest reiterates hoe he used a 5 day exit because he feels that getting to 0 from 7 isn't done as much as going from 0 to 7. there is some mental missmatch in his mind that cycles have optional looping and no continuity. If a person can't find 4 to 3 very often then what is the next step? trader666 will never figure this out. so I am trying to reset him and give him a new set of defaults. this need not work but it is a very interesting lab experiement with him to see how inpossible it becomes for people who are immobilized by the CW. T dog is up to doing individual word counts and I am working towards collective word counts.

The delay of digestion comes down to three levels as posted because of the mind building context during rest for people who are more or less mantally organized and/or proficient. the best reference series on this is DANA.

I'm upping the references to make it a negligible situation for anyone relying on me. The huge grey area.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I have tried to state that the algorithm is comprehensive, validated and rigorous. Using binary algebra (Boolean algebra is simply foreign to traders and to programmers. Using it in a vector orientation is even more difficult.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I'm a trader and a programmer (hack) and it's foreign to me. However, it doesn't seem like that difficult of a concept (either the data structure or the logic).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing is really difficult.

The pool extraction (PE) algorithm is an elephant in the room. grasping that money is made from price change and then looking at price change in markets in terms of the daily offering is simply a staggeringly large opportunity.

since computers have been invented and people came up with using software in them, there has been some focus on EMH and finding the anomolies using deeply chilled large computers.

The elephant stays in the room and eats hay and shits.

So "writing up" PE would be like creating a way to clone an elephant and put this in usable form in any bodies room.

So that was done with a couple of hundred bells and whistles (IP and TS's). It may be possible that this cannot be understood for some reason. The journals are now another result of this effort.

Look at how you, a person who trades and programs, can do several things. you have an algorithm, you have a knowledge of markets. you do trade so you know how to connect to the markes in two ways: data in and data out. So in math lingo you can use a math and express the math in a communicatable way. you can take this and code it by programming it into your mind and into a computer by following mind building rules and following laguaging coding rules.

The small bridge that apparently is needed is to have people be able to think. I paint pictures to get things to perculate.

They do not work with hypo so hypo wants to reminisce. I am accomodating his and it so far is a one way street.

At this point, specifically and generally, the elephant is in the room and for sure it is known how to clone elephants. The fast track is process learning by doing drills. The drills are posted over a four year period here. At any time anyone doing any drill can get his work chacked out immediately by someone who has his mind built from doing the drills in the past.

We keep the detractors busy and away from all resources. They, also , cannot see the elephant nor trade more than 1 contract, if that. They are safely corralled.
 
I find it very difficult to not just lay out all the logic (ET and the net doesn't have the capability to display it conversationally or symbolically). Recently a moderator expressed his lack of realization of this (Vikana).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Could you write it out using binary algebra and vector algebra and post a scan of it on ET?

yes and no.

I did it.

The ET and web has no capability of handling the posting.*

Also, unknown to you, is the fact that for making money for individuals, say in a family orientation, doing it from beginner on up to expert in six levels of learning takes little time.

Because the effectiveness and efficiency is what it is level to level, quite a bit of wealth is built and it is built quite rapidly. One example is a student one. By starting in the jr years and going to graduation, the ramp time after that is less than two years to be able to not trade anymore and have a lifetime income by being passive and having capital managed by others in order that the person may conduct any activities all of his life and be fully supported. If that person continued to trade, then he gets wealthier.

* in terms of readable paper this is approximately 2x3x3 in feet.
 
Jack, a posting "one-way street" you say? In your first post on this thread you basically told me to eat shit and die. So I slunk away in tears. Besides, it's hard to get an edge in word-wise with you. But if I WERE allowed to interview you, I would ask questions like this: I am sure that many readers here would like to know why you take the time to write such long posts, when it would seem that a simple statement like "Free mentoring for those willing to pass it forward and do good with the profits, 3X or more the daily range, only serious applicants need apply" would seem to suffice. It wouldn't do anything for greedy pigs like me, but I am sure that the gentleTodd's of the world would be attracted.

P.S.: Now I KNOW for sure you are a humorist: "innogerated"? You put my deliberate mis-spellings to shame!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top