Nope. It's all hearsay from Trump and his legal team and Dr. Shiva and my friends who listen to them too.Did you take this evidence, and file a complaint with the authorities? What did they tell you?

Nope. It's all hearsay from Trump and his legal team and Dr. Shiva and my friends who listen to them too.Did you take this evidence, and file a complaint with the authorities? What did they tell you?

Oh ok. It's just that you were sounding as though it were proven, smoking gun, irrefutable, hardcore,Nope. It's all hearsay from Trump and his legal team and Dr. Shiva and my friends who listen to them too.![]()
There's still a possibility election fraud might be all that.Oh ok. It's just that you were sounding as though it were proven, smoking gun, irrefutable, hardcore,
evidence.
Trillions of trillions of things in life are possible. This is why we have to focus on the things that are most probable.There's still a possibility election fraud might be all that.
Trillions of trillions of things in life are possible. This is why we have to focus on the things that are most probable.
Occam's Razor.
Giving all the facts; and all the so-called evidence. The simplest, and most probable scenario is that Trump simply just lost the election; and there is/was no fraud sufficient enough to change the outcome; and a lot of people aren't happy about the results.
It's also an incentive for lunatics to lie. We already have lunatics lying for free.On Tuesday, Texas lieutenant governor Dan Patrick offered up to a $1 million reward from his campaign funds for information about voter fraud anywhere in the country. If fraud really were as pervasive as Trump and his allies claim, though, and with all eyes on this election within the US and abroad, it seems unlikely that it would take a huge cash incentive to suss it out.https://www.wired.com/story/trump-voter-fraud-election-no-proof/
Well, there's some incentive to whistleblowers.
The news isn't reporting anyone taking him up on his offer.
Since the professionals can't currently find evidence of sufficient fraud, that means the whistle blower would have to possess such evidence, that no one else has.
All the King's horses, and all the King's men.Who are these professionals and how hard are they looking for evidence?
It's also an incentive for lunatics to lie. We already have lunatics lying for free.
But I think it has more to do with gassing up the Trump base. Any "whistle blower" story will have to be supported:
Ask and answer for yourself, "what could a whistle blower say, that also supports the currently known: facts, evidence, data, and physical exhibits?"
Since the professionals can't currently find evidence of sufficient fraud, that means the whistle blower would have to possess such evidence, that no one else has.
Occam's Razor.
You should finish doing that.I was beginning to mentally prepare myself to accept Biden as president,