Donald

[vanzandt]

View attachment 238311

Did you notice that odds on Republican control of the Senate jumped over +4% after the convention?
Its interesting when the polls and the betting odds diverge like that.

There is no doubt here however, the betting odds are more accurate. And before H4M or anyone else posts a screenshot from the last time around... between 2016 and now, the gaming sector's use of AI has been proven to be exponentially more accurate each year.

Covid threw a wrench in the stats of course, since there's not a whole lot of sports to keep stats on... but up until then, the 'bookies' (if you can even call these operations that) were zeroing in on a laser accuracy that shocked even me. The same kind of AI that is giving us self driving cars is being used by the big players in the online gambling sector. 2016 might as well be 1970 if we want to compare technologies. In a way at least.

Scary stuff really. In so many regards. So with that said... the Pub's jump of 4% aggregate over several of the top betting sites... Trump is obviously on a roll. Biden needs to come out of hiding.
These debates are gonna be the best ever.
They really should be PPV.
Give it all to charity.

 

[userque]

View attachment 238311

This just in ( https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/ ):

 

[vanzandt]

This just in ( https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/ ):

View attachment 238330

See my above post regarding polls vs betting odds.

Polls are useless. Period.
....Case closed.

 

[userque]

See my above post regarding polls vs betting odds.

Polls are useless. Period.
....Case closed.

Have you told @Buy1Sell2 this?

Nevermind, I just saw your post:

Did you notice that odds on Republican control of the Senate jumped over +4% after the convention?
Its interesting when the polls and the betting odds diverge like that.

There is no doubt here however, the betting odds are more accurate. And before H4M or anyone else posts a screenshot from the last time around... between 2016 and now, the gaming sector's use of AI has been proven to be exponentially more accurate each year.

Covid threw a wrench in the stats of course, since there's not a whole lot of sports to keep stats on... but up until then, the 'bookies' (if you can even call these operations that) were zeroing in on a laser accuracy that shocked even me. The same kind of AI that is giving us self driving cars is being used by the big players in the online gambling sector. 2016 might as well be 1970 if we want to compare technologies. In a way at least.

Scary stuff really. In so many regards. So with that said... the Pub's jump of 4% aggregate over several of the top betting sites... Trump is obviously on a roll. Biden needs to come out of hiding.
These debates are gonna be the best ever.
They really should be PPV.
Give it all to charity.

 

[vanzandt]

Have you told @Buy1Sell2 this?

Actually, he quotes the betting sites from what I've seen.

He also said we'd hit new highs on the S&P back in April. Most would have locked him up in the looney bin and thrown away the key. Myself included.
The cat has proven himself right many times over the years here.
Just keepin it real.

 

[userque]

Actually, he quotes the betting sites from what I've seen.

He also said we'd hit new highs on the S&P back in April. Most would have locked him up in the looney bin and thrown away the key. Myself included.
The cat has proven himself right many times over the years here.
Just keepin it real.

Have you wagered any bets?

 

[vanzandt]

Have you wagered any bets?

I wager bets 5 days/week in stocks; I have no need to wager bets on an election. Your attempt at a deflection ignores the underlying truth's in the words I wrote above.

And to be 100% honest, I have to ask myself why I am even responding to someone who thinks they can catch covid from the wind while walking all alone down the street.

Oh and btw.... if your point about viruses traveling thousands of miles from China via the jet-stream and then landing on/infecting people was even 1/2 way true.... I guess your blah blah blah about Trump not shutting things down soon enough is completely moot also. It would not have mattered. Right? Right.

I won't debate someone incapable of at least some semblance of intellectual discourse. You lost that 2 weeks ago. Right here:
https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/magatards-wont-wear-masks.346999/page-24#post-5174869

Lastly... dude... you are arguing with yourself.

On the one hand you drew me into this whole one on one back and forward by commenting on the cat cutting my grass on the zero-turn, saying "why is it stupid for him to wear a mask"?

On the other hand you have gone to great extents to prove the mask, in your opinion, doesn't work.

Do you see the flaw here!!!!?????
Are you that dense?
I think its safe to assume you'll never pass a bar exam.

Ooops. One more.

Lets say a million Wuhan Chinese do all sneeze at once and as luck would have it the jetstream lands it 3000 miles away on top of you as you walk Fido across the dog park wearing a mask looking stupid.... guess what buddy:

It gets in your eyes too.

So I guess if you want to live a life of paranoia while you walk all alone on a beautiful fall day you better get some of those Red Baron WW1 biplane goggles to wear with the mask, the life preserver and the meteor helmet.

(I honestly thought you were smarter than this)

ttyl

 

[userque]

I wager bets 5 days/week in stocks; I have no need to wager bets on an election. Your attempt at a deflection ignores the underlying truth's in the words I wrote above.

And to be 100% honest, I have to ask myself why I am even responding to someone who thinks they can catch covid from the wind while walking all alone down the street.

Oh and btw.... if your point about viruses traveling thousands of miles from China via the jet-stream and then landing on/infecting people was even 1/2 way true.... I guess your blah blah blah about Trump not shutting things down soon enough is completely moot also. It would not have mattered. Right? Right.

I won't debate someone incapable of at least some semblance of intellectual discourse. You lost that 2 weeks ago. Right here:
https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/magatards-wont-wear-masks.346999/page-24#post-5174869


ttyl

LMAO ... I'm still in your head, I see.

I wasn't trying to debate, but I understand the fear I invoked in you--nothing to be ashamed of.

I actually researched polls vs odds, and so far, tend to agree that odds are likely more accurate. I was just curious if you bet on the election.

Lots of snowflakes out tonight. Sorry I hurt you.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

This just in ( https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/ ):

View attachment 238330

Refer to Miami's posting above.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Did you notice that odds on Republican control of the Senate jumped over +4% after the convention?
Its interesting when the polls and the betting odds diverge like that.

There is no doubt here however, the betting odds are more accurate. And before H4M or anyone else posts a screenshot from the last time around... between 2016 and now, the gaming sector's use of AI has been proven to be exponentially more accurate each year.

Covid threw a wrench in the stats of course, since there's not a whole lot of sports to keep stats on... but up until then, the 'bookies' (if you can even call these operations that) were zeroing in on a laser accuracy that shocked even me. The same kind of AI that is giving us self driving cars is being used by the big players in the online gambling sector. 2016 might as well be 1970 if we want to compare technologies. In a way at least.

Scary stuff really. In so many regards. So with that said... the Pub's jump of 4% aggregate over several of the top betting sites... Trump is obviously on a roll. Biden needs to come out of hiding.
These debates are gonna be the best ever.
They really should be PPV.
Give it all to charity.

You mean this?