You're confusing me with jem I don't have a religion.
Does anyone actually believe in God or are they just afraid...
- Thread starter Joe
- Start date
You're confusing me with jem I don't have a religion.
"no... troll... " you just acknowledged a paper suggesting processes necessary to form life would be increased with a zero or negative cosmological constant.
There are many examples of how the cosmological constant is not the "settled science" you ignorantly presume in a feeble attempt to prop up your unintelligent argument for a "Creator"...
"The value of Î [cosmological constant] in our present universe is not known, and may be zero, although there is some evidence for a nonzero value; a precise determination of this number will be one of the primary goals of observational cosmology in the near future."
Sean Carroll "The Preposterous Universe".
Of course you're constantly wishing for a fantasy universe. Whether it's in the form of a Garden of Eden (lol) or of a multiverse that will remain unknown about.
..and while I'm about it....
...just wtf are you going on about. As the "idiot who thinks he is intelligent" you wouldn't even understand that if anything it would be your Universe "odds" subject to inverse gamblers fallacy, as all the variables are not known. You totally moronically ignorant righty redneck prick.
Have a good day.
...just wtf are you going on about. As the "idiot who thinks he is intelligent" you wouldn't even understand that if anything it would be your Universe "odds" subject to inverse gamblers fallacy, as all the variables are not known. You totally moronically ignorant righty redneck prick.
Have a good day.
you keep presenting quotes without links or dates..
you are the ultimate science troll.
when was that written...
Because the very recent paper you presented a few pages ago... started off acknowledging the fact that it is accepted science the constants of a universe are very finely tuned.
Could you be anymore of a troll.
you are the ultimate science troll.
when was that written...
Because the very recent paper you presented a few pages ago... started off acknowledging the fact that it is accepted science the constants of a universe are very finely tuned.
Could you be anymore of a troll.
Here is the paper that the Stroll presented, yet does not understand...
See the raison d'etre of the paper is to challenge the almost universally accepted idea that our universe's constants are finely tuned.
The author states.. he may have an preliminary inclusive hint of evidence to challenge that concept.
Here is the link to the cornell library to the paper your article cited....
http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2444
Preliminary Inconclusive Hint of Evidence Against Optimal Fine Tuning of the Cosmological Constant for Maximizing the Fraction of Baryons Becoming Life
Don N. Page
(Submitted on 12 Jan 2011 (v1), last revised 28 Jan 2011 (this version, v2))
The effective coupling `constants' of physics, especially the cosmological constant, are observed to have highly biophilic values. If this is not a hugely improbable accident, or a consequence of some mysterious logical necessity or of some simple principle of physics, it might be explained as a consequence either of an observership selection principle within a multiverse of many sets of effective coupling constants, or else of some biophilic principle that fine tunes the constants of physics to optimize life. Here a very preliminary inconclusive hint of evidence is presented against the hypothesis of optimal fine tuning of the cosmological constant by a biophilic principle that would maximize the fraction of baryons that form living organisms or observers.[/QUOTE]
See the raison d'etre of the paper is to challenge the almost universally accepted idea that our universe's constants are finely tuned.
The author states.. he may have an preliminary inclusive hint of evidence to challenge that concept.
Here is the link to the cornell library to the paper your article cited....
http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2444
Preliminary Inconclusive Hint of Evidence Against Optimal Fine Tuning of the Cosmological Constant for Maximizing the Fraction of Baryons Becoming Life
Don N. Page
(Submitted on 12 Jan 2011 (v1), last revised 28 Jan 2011 (this version, v2))
The effective coupling `constants' of physics, especially the cosmological constant, are observed to have highly biophilic values. If this is not a hugely improbable accident, or a consequence of some mysterious logical necessity or of some simple principle of physics, it might be explained as a consequence either of an observership selection principle within a multiverse of many sets of effective coupling constants, or else of some biophilic principle that fine tunes the constants of physics to optimize life. Here a very preliminary inconclusive hint of evidence is presented against the hypothesis of optimal fine tuning of the cosmological constant by a biophilic principle that would maximize the fraction of baryons that form living organisms or observers.[/QUOTE]
Fined tuned, from what ???? What was tuned, how was this tuning done, if there was not this mystical tuning what would the universe look like, what if this is the only way the universe could turn out? If this tuning happened why would you jump to conclusions that it was a singular all powerful god who did it? It seems the god did some kind of tuning line of thought is filled with numerous assumptions and speculations.
the fundamental laws which make the universe work are very finely tuned for life.
the standard model of physics has 20 or so constants tuned to 32 decimal places.
one of those constants is the cosmological constant.
It balances out gravity. it balances it out to 123 decimal places.
if it were to change the force at the 121 decimal spot the universe would crunch on itself or fly apart.
The top scientists in the world are amazed by this degree of tuning.
The possible explanations are
1. God.
2. a multiverse
3. a theory of everything which is not yet discovered.
watch this video...
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/2cT4zZIHR3s?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
the standard model of physics has 20 or so constants tuned to 32 decimal places.
one of those constants is the cosmological constant.
It balances out gravity. it balances it out to 123 decimal places.
if it were to change the force at the 121 decimal spot the universe would crunch on itself or fly apart.
The top scientists in the world are amazed by this degree of tuning.
The possible explanations are
1. God.
2. a multiverse
3. a theory of everything which is not yet discovered.
watch this video...
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/2cT4zZIHR3s?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
