Does anyone actually believe in God or are they just afraid...

[bigarrow]

You really are out of your league here.

LOL what are you doing here, you're the nitwit of ET even you're buddies know it. And of course you don't have a response or intelligent answer or question, just crude comments.
Go back to you're Obama bashing threads.

 

[Lucrum]

LOL what are you doing here, you're the nitwit of ET...

Because the Forest Gump of ET says so? It doesn't work that way dopey.

 

[bigarrow]

Because the Forest Gump of ET says so? It doesn't work that way dopey.

Damn mental midget won't leave, go back to your Obama threads boy before you get a brain freeze here, dumbass.

 

[Lucrum]

Damn mental midget won't leave, go back to your Obama threads boy before you get a brain freeze here, dumbass.

No I'll skip the spelling be. You'll have to look up my old Mensa test I took and use that. I don't think I have the motivation to take a test for bragging rights.

.

 

[stu]

if it were to change the force at the 121 decimal spot the universe would crunch on itself or fly apart.

Except you don't know that. It's you trying to say unsettled science is settled science when it obviously isn't. Just to force your "Creator" into things where it won't fit. You really are out of your league here.



" The views that I have expressed are far from rigorous scientific facts. The observational evidence for a cosmological constant, for inflation, and the mathematical evidence for a string theory landscape could all evaporate." Leonard Susskind

"I don't agree the Universe was designed by an intelligence" Leonard Susskind



This guy got it but bizarrely thought it atheists being dogmatic when the only ones really insisting the universe is fine tuned is Jem the raging theist and his sockpuppet. Two deluded and "ignorant ultimate 'pseudoscience' trolls".

It's all "settled science" don't ya' know. Opinion is now fact in the new world of science turned political activism. No real scientist would ever make such a absurd claim as to know for certain what is currently unknowable.

 

[jem]

Stroll has no problem he likes to lie and misrepresent science and scientists.
I recognized the quote as I have linked to it many times the last 4 years.

http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/leonard-susskind

David Gross of UC Santa Barbara says, "Science has managed to explain lots of other weird numbers—so why shouldn't we expect eventually to explain the cosmological constant and other key parameters?"

David is entirely correct in one respect. The views that I have expressed are far from rigorous scientific facts. The observational evidence for a cosmological constant, for inflation, and the mathematical evidence for a string theory landscape could all evaporate. So far they show no signs of doing so, but surprises happen. It is certainly premature to declare victory and close the question. I would be very worried if all theoretical physicists "gave up" (as David puts it) looking for a mathematical explanation for the "weird" value of the cosmological constant. But I think David exaggerates when he claims that science has explained anything like the fine-tuning of the cosmological constant.
---

In short at the time of the quote there was still a concern that perhaps they might still find a theory of everything... or the testing at cern would show something knew.
However, the extreme fine tuning of the Cosmological Constant was virtually proven when they used the standard model of physics to find the Higgs Boson at Cern about a year ago.

Its funny cause the 1950s thinking atheist troll just lies his ass off, over and over.

Except you don't know that. It's you trying to say unsettled science is settled science when it obviously isn't. Just to force your "Creator" into things where it won't fit. You really are out of your league here.



" The views that I have expressed are far from rigorous scientific facts. The observational evidence for a cosmological constant, for inflation, and the mathematical evidence for a string theory landscape could all evaporate." Leonard Susskind

"I don't agree the Universe was designed by an intelligence" Leonard Susskind



This guy got it but bizarrely thought it atheists being dogmatic when the only ones really insisting the universe is fine tuned is Jem the raging theist and his sockpuppet. Two deluded and "ignorant ultimate 'pseudoscience' trolls".

 

[Ricter]

Stroll has no problem he likes to lie and misrepresent science and scientists.
I recognized the quote as I have linked to it many times the last 4 years.

http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/leonard-susskind

David Gross of UC Santa Barbara says, "Science has managed to explain lots of other weird numbers—so why shouldn't we expect eventually to explain the cosmological constant and other key parameters?"

David is entirely correct in one respect. The views that I have expressed are far from rigorous scientific facts. The observational evidence for a cosmological constant, for inflation, and the mathematical evidence for a string theory landscape could all evaporate. So far they show no signs of doing so, but surprises happen. It is certainly premature to declare victory and close the question. I would be very worried if all theoretical physicists "gave up" (as David puts it) looking for a mathematical explanation for the "weird" value of the cosmological constant. But I think David exaggerates when he claims that science has explained anything like the fine-tuning of the cosmological constant.
---

In short in 2010 there was still a concern that perhaps they might still find a theory of everything... or the testing at cern would show something knew.
However, the extreme fine tuning of the Cosmological Constant was virtually proven when they used the standard model of physics to find the Higgs Boson at Cern about a year ago.

Its funny cause the troll just lies his ass off, over and over.
Why? Is it because he is a 1950s thinking backwards ass atheist... who can no admit there is evidence of a Tuner?

Would you agree that 97% of scientists think the universe appears fine-tuned?

 

[Covertibility]

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/oEl9kVl6KPc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[jem]

here is another sock puppet leftist... coming in to try and change the subject.

we are not talking about intelligent design on this thread.
if you wish to engage on that subject I will on a different thread.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/oEl9kVl6KPc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[Ricter]

here is another sock puppet leftist... coming in to try and change the subject.

we are not talking about intelligent design on this thread.
if you wish to engage on that subject I will on a different thread.

Intelligent design is different from fine tuning (by a tuner)?