Personally, I'm here to read what MAESTRO kindly prints, and for the cappuccinos that whatsisnamePhD is going to bring me.Quote from Xena:IMHO this whole random walk "discussion" is nothing but a fishing expedition trying to entice someone else to disclose his/her thought pattern and deduce a system from that.

Quote from intradaybill:
Congratulations, Wishing you many more healthy and prosperous years together.

Quote from zedDoubleNaught:
Perhaps it's a matter of scale then?
Also, if this not an unrelated or unresolvable tangent, is dimensionalism important? It seems like, it's random because we don't know what will happen in the future, but this could be due to human limitations of perceiving the time dimension as undirectional and not all observable at once. Would it make a difference if we were 10-dimensional beings, and the time dimension (from human perspective) was knowable all at once, as humans can see all points on a 2-d picture at once?
Quote from Xena:
IMHO this whole random walk "discussion" is nothing but a fishing expedition trying to entice someone else to disclose his/her thought pattern and deduce a system from that.
Quote from jem:
actually I take this statement back.
When trying to figure out what the afternoon was going to look like during lunch...
I was pretty sure that the least likely result would be a repeat of yesterday.
Is that a rhetorical question?.Quote from MAESTRO:3^3 is powerful indeed! Did you know that all of the prime numbers belong to a set that could be described as 6N +/- 1 ?
:eek:Quote from SrRuthenate:
Is that a rhetorical question?.![]()
We should getmon with zeddoublenaught's post...since the conversation has been chit-chat ever since that post...:eek: