Do you all Believe the woman who is accusing Va. Lt. Governor?

If she has no proof, I have a hard time accepting her testimony.

There is another woman that came forward so, that makes it two accusers now. He is entitled to due process but, should be charged if there is hard evidence of it! Judge Brett Kavanaugh did not even get that chance! His reputation was destroyed by liberal media despite, the very scant and questionable evidence if you call it that!
 
What a crock!
Put your friend forward to corroborate your story. She fails to do just that and then explain it away. The friend then says she believes Ms. Ford. Based on what? Their long time friendship.

"I don't remember that incident or that guy or that night but my buddy says it's so and I believe him."

Fortunately none of that holds up in court.

Does any of that even make any sense to you as being credible?
 
What a crock!
Put your friend forward to corroborate your story. She fails to do just that and then explain it away. The friend then says she believes Ms. Ford. Based on what? Their long time friendship.

"I don't remember that incident or that guy or that night but my buddy says it's so and I believe him."

Fortunately none of that holds up in court.

Does any of that even make any sense to you as being credible?

Investigate the allegations, that's all that is asked
 
Investigate the allegations, that's all that is asked

They did, and no one could substantiate her claims, not even her so called witnesses.

You don't want an investigation, you want a certain outcome. Be honest.
 
If she has no proof, I have a hard time accepting her testimony.
So far as the first accuser, I'm a bit confused by the.... mechanics.

It seems like we are talking about someone badgering or coercing a woman for oral sex as I'm pretty sure you cannot forcibly make someone do that. I'm a little unclear on exactly when badgering or coercion became sexual assault.
 
Nice spin...
however you did not advance the topic at all.
everything you said is what I said.
her witnesses did not corroborate her story.

What is the point of naming "witnesses" if they did not witness anything?


Ford herself had told the Post she didn’t think Keyser would remember the party since she had no reason to think anything really out of the ordinary happened there. Ford’s lawyers emphasized that point after Keyser’s statement to the committee became public. “It’s not surprising that Ms. Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it. It’s also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there,” Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, said.

Despite saying she hadn’t met Kavanaugh and doesn’t remember the party, Keyser told The Washington Post that she believes Ford.

Even Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the bedroom when Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, has not denied that such an episode took place. His sworn statement to the committee says, “I have no memory of this alleged incident,” “do not recall the party” and “never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”
 
Even Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the bedroom when Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, has not denied that such an episode took place. His sworn statement to the committee says, “I have no memory of this alleged incident,” “do not recall the party” and “never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”



I see. The person she identified as a witness said:

“I have no memory of this alleged incident,” “do not recall the party” and “never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”

Thanks for clearing that up. Maybe someone in Texas on trial for a murder there can call me as witness next week so that I can say that I dont recall being there and seeing it BUT, HEY, THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT DID NOT HAPPEN. Nice witness ya got there.

Ya can't make this shiite up.
 
Nice spin...
however you did not advance the topic at all.
everything you said is what I said.
her witnesses did not corroborate her story.

What is the point of naming "witnesses" if they did not witness anything?

Reminds me of the Justin Smollet case. Still no hard evidence of those two alleged attackers on video. Police now saying they will charge him if proven that he made it up. All these frauds need to be prosecuted under the law! Not only do they waste valuable police and FBI resources for other "real" victims out there, they put other people's lives in jeopardy and waste US taxpayers monies to boot!
 
Back
Top