Quote from John Merchant:
"Note when bar 2 reaches a price limit out side of bar 1."
Jack. A very concise algorithmic description. But the "reaches a price limit" bit is ambiguous to my reading as to whether bar 2 must be complete or not before you draw that channel. Mike.
Don't worry about it.
I am making a connection between the leading indicator (volume) and the price.
there are many people here who use a spike indicator that is determined by looking at DOM. what i said is not beginner stuff so you are not going to make any connections. It turns out the person i responded to has a lot on the ball and I am going to do a little house cleaning arond some of the places where a person can begin to get into the "groove".
You play the anomaly game as a B person so you are way out in right field and the game is long over for you.
this guy can really knock down millions if he gets out of his head everything that is not important and he focuses on getting on with each day by doing a great first entry and then keeping himself on the "right" side of the market.
I can change his charts with VERY LITTLE EFFORT on his and on my part.
He currently is trying too hard and missing the big money making picture by jumping all over the place.
His chart shows a portion of a day that is a "W" day. First, he pulls down the big money and then I will fool around with the intellectually challenging harvests.
There are only 81 bars in a day to handle; somehow he is screwing up big time by not figuring out the last 6 bars by midday.
Lets say he catches on in handling two bars and understands what I said about a single part of the second bar. Only 79 plus bars to go.
You for example immediately stepped outside of my couple of paragraphs and started farting around with off subject topics right away. You cannot learn from others. Why? Shit, who knows.
Look at lefty's annotations. He is very very broadly informed and trained and knowledgeable. My coments to him would be very different. His integrity is showing very nicely. He makes mistake after mistake and we all can determine why and how because of his integrity. AND he would listen to comments and he would profit from them.
One small bridge is what he wants to get. just one. then he will have a universal context for integrating his vaste knowledge and skill base.
because he has a "carry over" technique from day to day, all that has to be done is focus it in the context of the present market operating point which occurred as a consequence of leaving the prior context.
as he gets the continuing bridging straight, then the array of annotations are always in a powerful context.
You do the opposite. apparently your mind got fried looking for anomalies somewhere along the applied math trail when the market operates in a non-continuous go/nogo world (matrix of speciffically bounded cellular nature).
I have had 1005 false starts with the posting m... person....I am still hoping I can get him to shut down his imagination or whatever and begin, carefully, to making a lot of money.
You, on the other hand, are an embarassment to any thinking person in ET.