She hasn't been cleared of anything. Are you daft?
Do liberals know the definition of Collusion?
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
Then what is the basis of this Comey testimony?
Sen. Sasse: Do you think that Secretary Clinton break any laws related to classified data?
Director Comey: We have no evidence sufficient to justify the conclusion that she violated any of the statutes related to classified information.
Citation needed that the investigation is still ongoing
Using Comey as a rebuttal. OMG
Feel free to quote anyone else who is currently investigating Clinton
Good Lord, your talking points are weak.
Just quote anyone who says the investigation is ongoing, that's all. Just back up your statement in anyway you wish.
You think if there is no investigation going on, that she's exonerated? What a phool. By the way, you wouldn't know that there was an investigation going on or not.
You think there is no investigation going on into Trump's attempted rape of his daughter? Or him fildding young kids at his best friend Epstein's parties?
See I can make up stuff to?
So you guys want evidence while the investigation is going on into Trump's activities but with Clinton you are willing to run without even evidence of an investigation?
Hahahahhaa
It's rather hilarious watching all you guys debate the invisible man. Invisible because I've long put him on ignore and I just see your posts with nothing between them. You guys should try it. The guy doesn't provide any insight beyond what the left emails to it's listserv every morning. It's not like you're ever going to get him to go "hmm, that makes sense" on any subject at all.
I'm not a big one for using the ignore function, but sometimes it's necessary to remove the noise and get more signal.
I'm not a big one for using the ignore function, but sometimes it's necessary to remove the noise and get more signal.
Great article, and awesome nickname!
