Quote from NoDoji:
Got it.
Got it.
Working my ass off on this one.
Jack, you keep compelling me to read more stuff; I feel like a perpetual student.I need to BREAK OUT!!!
try this.
Quote from NoDoji:
Got it.
Got it.
Working my ass off on this one.
Jack, you keep compelling me to read more stuff; I feel like a perpetual student.I need to BREAK OUT!!!
Quote from peilthetraveler:
This question can easily be answered by looking at the top 100 traders. I remember reading them in trader monthly (before they went out of business) back in 2005 or 2006. As i read I noticed that out of these 100 top traders, only 1 was a woman.
Thats your answer right there.
Quote from peilthetraveler:
This question can easily be answered by looking at the top 100 traders. I remember reading them in trader monthly (before they went out of business) back in 2005 or 2006. As i read I noticed that out of these 100 top traders, only 1 was a woman.
Thats your answer right there.
I've also noticed similar trends in other areas of thinking where women are not as good as men. Like chess for instance. The top males players have ratings several hundred points higher than the best female chess player ever.
Some women can excell more than SOME men, but thats only on a case by case scenario. I believe if you take any event where both men & women know nothing about the said event and make them learn it on the spot, the man will pull ahead of the woman everytime.
For instance. If you took a rubiks cube into a part of the world where nobody had ever seen or heard of one, you can be sure that it would be the men that figured out how to solve it first.
Quote from rubberbird_50:
actually, those worksheets were interesting, and i thought my post was out of line, so i pulled it. sorry i didnt get it out before you saw it
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Women can never match men in areas that take:
a)High Risk
b)Profound confidence bordering on "macho" and heavy duty analytical work.
Women are more likely to avoid this field altogether because it is not "safe"