I don't know why don't you "splain it to us Lucy".
Whatever the process, It sure seems to get your panties in wad.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Disproving atheists in 82 seconds
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
I don't know why don't you "splain it to us Lucy".
Whatever the process, It sure seems to get your panties in wad.
Quote from Free Thinker:
"if conclusions contradict the word of God, the conclusions are wrong no matter how many scientific facts may appear to back them."biology textbook printed by conservative Christian publisher Bob Jones University Press
The fact that you have quotes ready to go, obviously means you've invested a lot of time effort in basically in your own words arguing with people who believe in the equivalence of leprechauns.
Looks like a mental disease to me.
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
The fact that you have quotes ready to go, obviously means you've invested a lot of time effort in basically in your own words arguing with people who believe in the equivalence of leprechauns.
Looks like a mental disease to me.
you are defending believing in something that has equivalence of believing in leprechauns. what does that make you?
sombody has to have to courage to speak up and tell people that they believe some crazy shit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPs_j1EEplI
We Have A Responsibilityâ¦as unbelievers, we have a responsibility to the future of our species to do whatever we can to disseminate the science and eliminate the myth.
I'll take your response to mean that you did NOT actually read ANY of Dawkins's books, even though you refer to him time and again to support your various arguments.Quote from jem:
I was going to ignore this, because I am worried I have been arguing with a person who does not comprehend... but you have been such a dick at times...
Do you understand the difference between evidence and conclusion?
I will try and teach on your level...
When you are watching a law show on t.v. and the visiting guest star makes a great legal argument to the jury... do you say wow good evidence, the show is over?
Or do you wait for your favorite star to come out and argue for a new way interpret that evidence - perhaps with the aid of the detective?
Or... when you were watching My Cousin Vinnny... did you think the boys really killed the guy at the mini mart after the prosecution presented evidence and rested?
<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/EdCkrHa-pfY?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/EdCkrHa-pfY?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Richard Dawkins: I'm '6.9 out 7' sure that God does not exist
Speaking at a debate at Oxford University with the Archbishop of Canterbury, the man regarded as the world's most famous atheist admits that he cannot be certain that God does not exist.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...m-6.9-out-7-sure-that-God-does-not-exist.html
Speaking at a debate at Oxford University with the Archbishop of Canterbury, the man regarded as the world's most famous atheist admits that he cannot be certain that God does not exist.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...m-6.9-out-7-sure-that-God-does-not-exist.html
Interesting. According to Dawkins the chance God exists is same as that of the Tooth Fairy.Quote from twofacedjoker:
Richard Dawkins: I'm '6.9 out 7' sure that God does not exist
Speaking at a debate at Oxford University with the Archbishop of Canterbury, the man regarded as the world's most famous atheist admits that he cannot be certain that God does not exist.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...m-6.9-out-7-sure-that-God-does-not-exist.html