I'm '6.9 out 7' sure that Atheism does not exist.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Disproving atheists in 82 seconds
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
Honesty isn't an atheist's strong suit.
There is no shortcut to intellectual honesty. Atheism requires sacrifice, in that you sacrifice the illusion of immortality and the sense of transcendent purpose. But, religion requires the sacrifice of critical thinking, self determination, your time, your money, and logic. (Kate)
Brass stop being a troll and deal with the science.
Our Universe appears to be fine tuned.
Deal with it with some intellectual rigor instead of your petty et atheist troll b.s.
Our Universe appears to be fine tuned.
Deal with it with some intellectual rigor instead of your petty et atheist troll b.s.
Quote from jem:
You have no idea who to defend your anti science view point... so you use the old lawyer trick and start banging on the tables when the science and the facts are not on your side.
here is the pied piper of atheism...
explaining to you all the appearance of fine tunings and the possible explanations.
<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mlD-CJPGt1A?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mlD-CJPGt1A?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
here is Penrose... he is as big as you get in cosmology and math.
<object width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/WhGdVMBk6Zo?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/WhGdVMBk6Zo?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Quote from Brass:
Wow. Whole chapters. But not an entire book, eh? Not even one. And you find his intellectual rigor lacking?
Parody, right?
Quote from jem:
For stu...
Explain the context of these videos
Explain again!? Why?
The context is totally obvious when you don't misinterpret, snatch lines and soundbites out of them as you do to bend around your weired religious ideas. It starts with both Dawkins and Penrose being self-proclaimed atheists.
Dawkins is the last person to suggest what your silly cut & paste nonsense from some GodrUS website is trying to dishonestly claim.
Penrose as the top mathematician and physicist you say he is, would never rationalize probability in the way your chosen form of hogwash tries to suggest. The truncated video you keep constanstantly puking up won't change that fact.
It's all bogus , out of context and what is very telling is how religious views are so often based on utter crap like that.
If you weren't so hell bent on ignoring context you might realize it.
You will never be able to drag science or math in particular down to the level of religion or religious belief. They just would no longer be science or math.
Why in the world would you put Science and Mathematics in the same category. One is a religion to counteract another religion while the other is time tested.Quote from stu:
You will never be able to drag science or math in particular down to the level of religion or religious belief. They just would no longer be science or math.