You have no idea just how blasphemous is Judeo-Christanity in its representation of Good.
. In the telling of a story about the origins of man, the status quo of man, and the future of man, it does indeed insult the actual Good. This blasphemy is technically not worse than the standard blasphemy that is ongoing ever since "the beginning" of all things mankind and his surrounds. Blasphemy can only be worse if it delays awakening longer than the average insulting circumstance. If i could overcome it in a few years of actual seeking (the truth), perhaps it is not that potent.
Delays are measured in life-death cycles. The opposite of delays are miracles. So yah, it would be a miracle if a Judeo-Christian awakens from the deep sleep of a dead Christ. Til then, about 99.9% of everything a Christian does, believes and thinks (dreams) is insulting to what is actually Good. Eating, breathing, and dying are all blasphemous, btw.
The good news is Good is not actually harmed by blasphemy, given what does not exist (mankind) cannot hurt what does exist (Good). Blasphemy hurts the blasphemer such that what you do to Good, you do to yourself. This is because every blasphemer started out as the Good Self. A blasphemer is a psychological separation (a trick of mind) that re-identifies, re-fashions, re-defines, or otherwise deems (thinks, believes) Good to be something Good is not.
Everything Good is not (not Good) is blasphemous. A blasphemer never really exists except in the fragile bubble of his own beliefs. The blasphemer is a kind of lie, told to oneself, that takes on a life of its own, the more details are added to the lie. The comparable metaphor is dreaming, which is a trick of the mind, whereupon many details are embellished into circumstances that are simply not true. In a dream, one can lie to oneself about who or what one is. Worse, there is zero recollection about how a dream begins, at least from within rhe dream. So it is, man has no clue about his own genesis, taking it for granted by a higher power. If man really knew anything about his origins, he would soon be awakening, because knowledge, of anything, is antithetical to sleeping/dreaming. Dreaming relies upon faith, the antitheses of knowledge.
Thus, the story that all sin can be forgiven except blasphemy against the holy spirit is itself blasphemous as it further misrepresents Good. For sin to be unforgivable, it has to exist...it has to actually be happening. The idea that Good must aknowledge sin/blasphemy is itself a sin. Thus, forgiveness is actually a function incumbent upon sinners/blasphemers. In a worst case scenario a blasphemer could drive himself so deeply asleep he would never figure out how/why to forgive. In a bad case, a blasphemer would continue experiencing the sufferings inherent in blasphemy for thousands of life+death cycles over many millenium of "time", which itself is a kind of blasphemy.
Judeo-Christians dont understand how the origins of mankind are the result of blasphemy against the Good Self. If they did understand, they would be on the verge of awakening. Forgiveness reverses the origin of mankind by reversing the mental trick that seems to provide mankind some space to exist. As such, forgiveness is also a kind of mental trick. To forgive, you must be honest about the status quo, honest about sin. What takes away the sins of the world is truth/honesty about the sinners circumstances. Good does not forgive because Good has never been dishonest about Good. Nor has Good ever acknowledged the existence of the sinful circumstances that blasphemers believe in, such as pain, and death/change.
So, are there some kinds of blasphemy that blasphemers blast, that are ultimately unforgivable? No. Are there types of blasphemy more potent to prolong pain and suffering through many life-death cycles? Im not sure. But there are mutually exclusive concepts. As long as Judeo-Christians believe certain things, the blasphemy inherent in the faith in those circumstances could prevent them from ever discovering how/what/why to forgive. Without the forgiveness there is no way to re-deem ones notions of what is, or who is Good. Continuous wrong-think (deeming, believing) about Good is what unforgiveness is all about. Its you, the blasphemer, which does not forgive.
Forgiveness is a mental trick blasphemers must employ to overcome the mental tricks that seem to give blasphemers existence out of an original "void" (of nothingness) to "begin" with. Forgiveness returns sinners/blasphemers back to the "void" (nothingness) from which they came. Forgiveness is about re-deeming, re-thinking ones entire existence. This is what redemption is all about. Damnation is about deeming dishonestly. Redemption is about deeming honestly. All deeming and re-deeming is about Good.
For example, death is blasphemous. You could never believe Good could die, and be re-deemed,/forgiven. Your mis-deeming of Good is what prevents your redemption/resurrection (awakening from deep sleep). Its your own (as the blasphemer) deeming that Good includes death/change that prevents you from avoiding death/change.
Another example, forgiveness redefines (re-deems) death by comparing to something less ominous like sleep. Forgiveness can then further redefine sleep in such a way that the fear of awakening is released.
I decided to leave off of writing on my threads in the religious section, but since Good1 seems to want to either engage me in a dialogue with him, against my wishes, or he just wants to post his views on my threads, I have decided try to defend my threads and give an attempt to responding to him in this thread and hope he stays off of my others.
Not sure how this is going to go.
Last edited: