That's just another one of your conspiracy theories...Heh, you know, maybe it is just me because I am sort of a deplorable.......but that guy on the right looks a lot like Barack Obama to me.
... Just like your mole/ informant one.
Did the American KGB place a mole in the Trump campaign?
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
... Just like your mole/ informant one.
Had a chance to hear a little of R. Limbaugh this afternoon. His take is that this Harper thing is also only a deep state inspired distraction and that the real corruption is still being hidden from view.
He believes that the Awan brothers and their connection to the server and email fiasco is what really needs to be investigated.
My personal belief is that that server ties Seth Rich to his assassination.
He believes that the Awan brothers and their connection to the server and email fiasco is what really needs to be investigated.
My personal belief is that that server ties Seth Rich to his assassination.
As I say every month, we will be doing a full round of Susan Rice- again- before this is over. Next to Hillary though, she is absolutely the second best liar in DC and that takes in a lot of turf. But she is dirty- top to bottom- in all of this- or parts of it. She had her role...and as we know from the page's emails to strzok....Obama likes to be kept informed.
Also, we have evolved from no mole to now he is just an informant and then to he was actually helping Trump. Okay fine, whatever.
The question I have, is where has it been established that Harper was the only one in the network? I mean realistically the fbi and the deep state were on to trump from every angle. I doubt that he was the only one.
Last edited:
When you lay with dogs you get flees.
Trump is/was no babe in the woods and he surrounded himself with people like Manafort, Page, Popadopolous and Flynn. Of course the fbi was on them.
You keep making this about Trump, and he may have a big role, small role or no role, but his campaign was most likely infiltrated with Russian moles/informants.
At the very least, this dog needed deworming.
Lot of stuff went on and is going on- in state intel agencies too.
Let me know when Trump is indicted on any of the charges in muellers appointment -if any were even specified. We are getting past the talky-talky phase. This is about Trump and Mueller knows it. Talking about bad actors around him takes Trump down several notches and ditto for the bad actors in the fbi. But in the end court proceedings require the prosecutor to land somewhere more specific than that in regard to Trump. There has never been a day when I have not conceded that some of his entourage will go down on side crimes. That is the nature of a witch-hunt.
When do you think Trump will be indicted?
I don’t know if Trump will be indicted, if ever. I know his biggest liability will come when he sits down with Mueller.
As to cleaning the Russian sympathizers out of the Trump campaign, I don’t see why you have a problem with that. I understand you want to make this investigation a be all, end all around Trump but it’s really not. It’s about foreign actors illegally interfering in our elections to get their preferred candidate.
Now some other stuff has come up with UAE, Saudi Arabia and Israel that is also interesting and needs to be looked at too.
Long story short, we can’t just open up our elections to unregistered foreign actors and governments just because you’re pleased Trump won this time. It will turn into candidates selling American interests for help winning elections.
Anyway, the Mueller report is what you should be concerned with, not a Trump indictment.
Ex-Trump Adviser Calls President’s Claims That Informant Spied On Campaign ‘Embarrassing’
Trump has asked the Justice Department to look into whether an FBI informant infiltrated his campaign for political purposes.
A former adviser to President Donald Trump on Monday fired back at the president’s allegations that the Obama administration had an FBI informant infiltrate his 2016 campaign.
“This is embarrassing,” A.J. Delgado tweeted, along with a Fox Business interview with former Trump adviser Sebastian Gorka. Gorka said it would be a serious issue to place an asset in another party’s campaign for political purposes ― if the accusations turned out to be true.
Delgado then defended her position, saying she didn’t feel the need to subscribe to conspiracy theories.
The president tweeted Sunday to demand an official probe into whether President Barack Obama sent an FBI informant to the Trump campaign. The Justice Department said it would look into the claims as part of its existing investigation into whether Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election.
An FBI informant was sent to speak with several Trump campaign advisers who were found to have suspicious ties to Russia, The New York Times and Wall Street Journal reported.
Trump and law enforcement officials also reached an agreement Monday to allow top GOP lawmakers to review classified documents related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, including information on the FBI source.
Trump has asked the Justice Department to look into whether an FBI informant infiltrated his campaign for political purposes.
A former adviser to President Donald Trump on Monday fired back at the president’s allegations that the Obama administration had an FBI informant infiltrate his 2016 campaign.
“This is embarrassing,” A.J. Delgado tweeted, along with a Fox Business interview with former Trump adviser Sebastian Gorka. Gorka said it would be a serious issue to place an asset in another party’s campaign for political purposes ― if the accusations turned out to be true.
Delgado then defended her position, saying she didn’t feel the need to subscribe to conspiracy theories.
The president tweeted Sunday to demand an official probe into whether President Barack Obama sent an FBI informant to the Trump campaign. The Justice Department said it would look into the claims as part of its existing investigation into whether Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election.
An FBI informant was sent to speak with several Trump campaign advisers who were found to have suspicious ties to Russia, The New York Times and Wall Street Journal reported.
Trump and law enforcement officials also reached an agreement Monday to allow top GOP lawmakers to review classified documents related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, including information on the FBI source.
If this ever were to happen in the United States, there would be evidence of such. And someone would have to find that evidence to make a credible charge. Simply saying that something is true, does not make it true, but it can make it true in the minds of the naive whether there is evidence or not. Even the evidence can be invented by those clever enough to use credulity for profitable purpose. This is a goldmine of profit tapped by muckraking journalists everywhere.
By the way, Rupert Murdoch is not by any means the first in the U.S. to realize how the millions of naive can be a lucrative source of profit if one is willing to cast integrity aside and lie with a straight face and a serious demeanor. It might be fair to say, however, that since at least the late 19th Century in Western countries, Murdoch has had only one equal, and that would be W.R. Hearst. Hearst was instrumental in pushing the U.S. into the Spanish American War through his muckraking, despite a lack of credible evidence. We have seen it all before.
If ever you have any doubt about the power of a lie in the hands of a skillful and persistent liar in the face of a total lack of credible evidence, recall that it was true in the minds of millions that Obama wasn't born in the United States long after it was true in reality that he was.
Last edited:
Sorry but the FBI's engagement with fusion and the Hillary funded dossier are established facts that they have to deal with. So let's take the "if this were ever to happen" language right out of the discussion. You do realize that Hillary was Trump's opponent right?
You may think that everything was tidy and proper with that little scenario but you have several players running around cannabalizing the others now by trying to shift the blame to them to stay out the slammer. Tidy for you. Not so tidy for them.
Ummmm....quite a reach into the bottom of the barrel if you have to pull out AJ Delgado. I'm sure she's looking for something to do to get away from that kid, though.