Your study is flawed and fraught with limitations. I’ve already pointed them out and they have been criticized similarly by other reviewers.
1) Only used acute infections thus eliminating 80% of patients.
2) no adjustments for pre existing conditions
3) no indication if myo cases were with COVID or cuz COVID
4) many of the studies in the meta analysis caution against drawing conclusions on risk due to their limitations on study design.
All this tells us that the study is weak and it doesn’t mesh with any of the other studies done.
You probably thought the Together study was also a perfect example of how ivermectin doesn’t work. That’s just science.
A study that covers 58 million people across countries is 'flawed and limited' while you peddle studies with sample size of less than 1000 as 100% proof of your stupid conspiracies.
Why don't you post one of these 'other' studies that say the opposite?