Diamond of ‘Diamond and Silk’ Dies Suddenly from COVID, Trump says 'heart gave out'

Laces out stepping up with opinoins and meeting facts

boxer-punch-boxer.gif
Dude you’ve been smacked by fact after fact on this thread and you remain in denial.
I would be too if I was lied to, bullied, coerced and gaslit to take an unsafe, ineffective, unnecessary experimental gene therapy shot (5 times now????). LOL.
 
Why is that a surprise, the paper you posted said COVID causes heart damage.

Or you don't want to read that part of the paper you posted?
Did you read how the vaccine causes heart damage? And how the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission or infection? LOOOOOL

I mean you have to be dumb deaf and blind to not see what’s going on. That’s you
 
Did you read how the vaccine causes heart damage? And how the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission or infection? LOOOOOL

That has nothing to do with what I pointed out - COVID causes MORE damage than the vaccine and yet you don't attribute any increase to COVID at all

Is that how you do science?

Can you for once address a point directly instead of trying to peddle these lame obvious tactics?
 
That has nothing to do with what I pointed out - COVID causes MORE damage than the vaccine and yet you don't attribute any increase to COVID at all

Is that how you do science?

Can you for once address a point directly instead of trying to peddle these lame obvious tactics?
COVID doesn’t do more damage than the vaccine. Specifically to the heart. And most specifically to young people.
COVID is a cold for most people with an IFR 2 orders of magnitude lower than what they scared you into believing.
The COVID vaccine doesn’t work, actually it’s negative efficacy - so why take it - to increase your risk of damage?
This is how you science. And you’ve been wrong and following the wrong since the jump.
Pathetic!!
 
COVID doesn’t do more damage than the vaccine. Specifically to the heart. And most specifically to young people.
COVID is a cold for most people with an IFR 2 orders of magnitude lower than what they scared you into believing.
The COVID vaccine doesn’t work, actually it’s negative efficacy - so why take it - to increase your risk of damage?
This is how you science. And you’ve been wrong and following the wrong since the jump.
Pathetic!!

Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine. These findings support the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations.

Of patients diagnosed with myocarditis (in both vaccination and COVID-19 cohort) 1.07% were hospitalized and 0.015% died. The relative risk (RR) for myocarditis was more than seven times higher in the infection group than in the vaccination group [RR: 15 (95% CI: 11.09–19.81, infection group] and RR: 2 (95% CI: 1.44-2.65, vaccine group).


https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.951314/full

Go peddle your crap to uneducated hillbillies
 
Dude you’ve been smacked by fact after fact on this thread and you remain in denial.
I would be too if I was lied to, bullied, coerced and gaslit to take an unsafe, ineffective, unnecessary experimental gene therapy shot (5 times now????). LOL.


Every time you whine to a poster they have been bullied and forced to take a vax 5 times we know you ran out of arguments. No one was lied to ... you just dont know the difference betwen facts and opinion...

tell me again how you know that woman miscarried due to the vax after not reviewing her medical file?

tell me again how you misread the birthrate drop graph which actually showed the birthrates snapped back to original levels just a few months later...

You are entitled to your opinion on the vax but dont push bullshit about it

tell me again why we are all doing this to you:

giphy.gif
 
Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine. These findings support the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations.

Of patients diagnosed with myocarditis (in both vaccination and COVID-19 cohort) 1.07% were hospitalized and 0.015% died. The relative risk (RR) for myocarditis was more than seven times higher in the infection group than in the vaccination group [RR: 15 (95% CI: 11.09–19.81, infection group] and RR: 2 (95% CI: 1.44-2.65, vaccine group).


https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.951314/full

Go peddle your crap to uneducated hillbillies
Your study is flawed and fraught with limitations. I’ve already pointed them out and they have been criticized similarly by other reviewers.
1) Only used acute infections thus eliminating 80% of patients.
2) no adjustments for pre existing conditions
3) no indication if myo cases were with COVID or cuz COVID
4) many of the studies in the meta analysis caution against drawing conclusions on risk due to their limitations on study design.
All this tells us that the study is weak and it doesn’t mesh with any of the other studies done.

You probably thought the Together study was also a perfect example of how ivermectin doesn’t work. That’s just science.
 
Back
Top