So I thought you said they didn't release a list, and that Sunshine Law this and transparency that....
But your article (or the one mentioned) says:
Florida eventually released a list of the 26 math textbooks rejected for "prohibited concepts" (the remainder were rejected for other reasons) but there was no information explaining the rejection.
As for the rest of the article, several points should be considered:
1. The article says it reviewed 8 of the 26 books, and said there was nothing there that should be considered worthy of adoption refusal. We are supposed to take the article's word for it, of course.
2. The article acknowledges that the books contain "SEL - Selective-Emotional Learning" which the article says "right wing activists claim that SEL is the same as CRT, but it isn't". Once again, we are supposed to take the article's word that this is so.
3. The entire argument of what in SEL is acceptable and what in CRT is acceptable and whether one crosses into the other is
subjective. Meaning my boundaries are different than yours as to what would be considered acceptable. Since the government of Florida has the responsibility to decide, it is their subjectivity we must all accept.
Just like every other state. If we do not like it, we should vote out the politicians deciding. So far, it would appear the residents of Florida accept the judgment of DeSantis if polling is a proxy for their feelings.
4. the article admits:
There are some discussions of race and racial inequality, but they are used to illustrate mathematical concepts.
That this is "no big deal" to the author of the article has nothing to do with whether Florida finds it acceptable. Florida likely wants to focus solely on math without any of this in their textbooks. As a parent of a child attending a Florida public school, I agree.