Dems use disinformation from Russia to attack Trump

[exGOPer]

this why I said you have the integrity of a clinton and the brains of waters.
you point means nothing...
did you read the quote from the article...

"The source said that Gowdy and Chaffetz had decided together that Chaffetz’s panel would explore the email issue and Gowdy’s probe would stay “pure” to Benghazi. In mid-March, Chaffetz even announced plans to send a detailed inquiry to the State Department. But it didn’t happen, and the source said it was Boehner who quashed the Oversight Committee’s plans."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ged-the-history-of-the-benghazi-story/447747/

NONE of that stops Chaffetz from ORDERING investigations by an EXECUTIVE agency - that's how we got into this debate if your senile brain can remember.

My very first response on the matter

Again, that's blatantly untrue. Congressional committees have the authority to ask FBI to conduct investigations, here is an example

www.businessinsider.com/congress-fbi-new-clinton-email-investigation-2016-7

Better luck next time.

And by the way, Trump can easily order an investigation into all this, why doesn't he?

How the fuck is having the authority to ask FBI to conduct an investigation same as CONDUCTING THEIR OWN INVESTIGATIONS which OF COURSE Boehner could control - because he controls the FUNDING.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart .

 

[jem]

how the hell could you be acting like you know Boehner was not controlling this stuff when you have absolutely nothing to back your lying ass up.

 

[jem]

below is the stupid lie you started with... that I objected to. somehow to cover up your lying ass... you bring all the tangential red herring crap to try and get out of your troll lie.

Just admit you had no basis for making your stupid comment because you get paid to write shit whether its true or not.

i don't care if you think federal investigation... morphs into order FBI vs boehner pays for it.

you lied... you were caught...

you are a kook and a troll.

Actually Republicans control the investigative committees and have full authority to initiate a federal investigation.

 

[exGOPer]

this is the stupid shit you started with.... and somehow to cover up your lying ass... you bring all the tangential crap into it.

you are a kook and a troll.

Do you understand the difference between a FEDERAL INVESTIGATION vs a CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION which is what you linked to in the Atlantic article?

You are pathetically ignorant.

 

[exGOPer]

how the hell could you be acting like you know Boehner was not controlling this stuff when you have absolutely nothing to back your lying ass up.

How the fuck does Boehner control Chaffetz request for an FBI investigation. In fact, even Democrats can request a federal investigation into someone as minority members, Speaker doesn't have any control over that.

 

[jem]

let me put this is a near binary form so you understand it. all those other arguments you are making are tangential crap you are making up to avoid the truth.

You must answer yes or no for you own sanity.

Did you make the statement quoted below?

If yes.. .you are caught lying again.
If no... you need meds

Ryan or Boehner don't control the committees, once the chairman of each committee is appointed, they have full authority on how to proceed.

 

[exGOPer]

let me put this is a near binary form so you understand it. all those other arguments you are making are tangential crap you are making up to avoid the truth.

You must answer yes or no for you own sanity.

Did you make the statement quoted below?

If yes.. .you are caught lying again.
If no... you need meds

Proceed on WHAT?

What was I referring to?

Is it not important that you remember what I was talking about in my very first post and subsequent posts?

I started this line of argument by talking about a FBI investigation, I again mentioned a FEDERAL investigation and explained again and again when and where a Speaker can step in.

You read one line and think I said ABSOLUTE authority, your dis-ingenuousness is not my problem. You tried the same tactic with the DELETED Seth Rich story, you tried the same with the 'PEER REVIEWED' paper story. you only see what you want to see.

 

[jem]

how do we know exgopper is lying?
he is typing.

answer my question above... yes or no.
it will lead you back on the path to integrity.

keep going down this path of lies and covering with more lies and you will snap.

Proceed on WHAT?

What was I referring to?

Is it not important that you remember what I was talking about in my very first post and subsequent posts?

I started this line of argument by talking about a FBI investigation, I again mentioned a FEDERAL investigation and explained again and again when and where a Speaker can step in.

You read one line and think I said ABSOLUTE authority, your dis-ingenuousness is not my problem. You tried the same tactic with the DELETED Seth Rich story, you tried the same with the 'PEER REVIEWED' paper story. you only see what you want to see.

 

[exGOPer]

how do we know exgopper is lying?
he is typing.

answer my question above... yes or no.
it will lead you back on the path to integrity.

keep going down this path of lies and covering with more lies and you will snap.

I answered your question, you just don't want to admit that I debunked your ignorant claims

 

[jem]

once again...

how do we know exgopper is lying?
he is typing.

answer my question above... yes or no.
it will lead you back on the path to integrity.

keep going down this path of lies and covering with more lies and you will snap.