So basically Trump has been lying when he told all the media outlets that the FBI stole his passports. Got it.
View attachment 292166
So basically, you failed reading comprehension?
So basically Trump has been lying when he told all the media outlets that the FBI stole his passports. Got it.
View attachment 292166
So basically Trump has been lying when he told all the media outlets that the FBI stole his passports. Got it.
View attachment 292166
So basically, you failed reading comprehension?
Not surprisingly, all of your flat footed statements need to be proven at trial. Triump's declarations supersede any previous labeling on documents.
If Trump's attorney relied upon Trump's statements that all of the documents had been declassified upon his either verbal or written directive then there is no lying involved on the part of the attorney regardless of whether he did or did not.
In any case, Garland raided the place put the country's attention on him. Now he has to deliver. Let's see it. I wonder if he will do a physical arrest of trump or a just issue a subpoena? He has to deliver on this or it mega-feeds into the political theater to harm Trump view.
No.
The FBI took his passports.
Who are you going to believe? Trump or the DOJ?
If the DOJ and the lefty media say the FBI did not, then, they did.
Work with that a little.
If you're much younger, then that could help explain why you guys seem so easily swayed by both mis- and dis-information without bothering to check it out. It's amazing how you guys seem to fall for stuff that most older more experienced individuals would immediately recognize as being unlikely to be true.Who the hell is 60 yrs old?
Or perhaps you made this up as convenient to your narrative. The truth is more likely that prior state secretaries did what Ms Clinton did and no one noticed or brought it to anyone's attention. Regardless, there are no substantive parallels between the Hillary incident and the present one. After the facts now known surfaced, the appearance in the present instance is that of an intentional stealing of highly sensitive government information.But it was settled by then...
If you're much younger, then that could help explain why you guys seem so easily swayed by both mis- and dis-information without bothering to check it out. It's amazing how you guys seem to fall for stuff that most older more experienced individuals would immediately recognize as being unlikely to be true.
Age is only correlated to wisdom. One doesn't ensure the other, especially in your case. You seem determined to wholly accept what fits your narrative (which aligns almost completely with party line) without said diligence performed to verify.
Prove me wrong. Tell me what you go against the democratic party on.