Im often astonished that you believe your own lies but it’s actually very informative. Trump probably believes Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama really did steal or destroy top secret information. And he probably really did think, if they can get away with it so can I. Of course the problem is what you and Trump believe isn’t true.
Demoncrats raid Mar-A-Largo to stop Trump because they do not have a candidate
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
Im often astonished that you believe your own lies but it’s actually very informative. Trump probably believes Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama really did steal or destroy top secret information. And he probably really did think, if they can get away with it so can I. Of course the problem is what you and Trump believe isn’t true.
Ohh yeah Biden, international criminal mastermind. Where’s the billions of dollars though?
Yeh sure. You and your ilk believed everything that was vomited out about the Russia, Russia, Russia scam and got nothing on Trump. And neither did Mueller.
How those pee-pee tapes coming along?
Facts don't seem to matter, it's about how loud, long and repetitive one can rant on a grievance by peddling the victim card. It's not about the candidate being a true victim but rather connecting and resonating with the self-perceived victims in our society - but not all of them.
The dynamic is much like the Civil War didn't convey the same rights to the indigenous population as the freed slaves.
Your paraphrase is inaccurate, read his actual words and not some regurgitated influencer rant;
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/what-the-mueller-report-says-about-obstruction/
Not going to re-read all that right now.
Mueller bloviated in his report but publicly stated or allowed Bill Barr to state without objection that Mueller agreed to no prosecuting Trump.
Not going to replay all that.
Bottom line: Big witchhunt for Trump on Russia. No prosecution.
Same set up for Jan 6. Big made-for-hollywood production, and lots of reports from the committee concluding all sorts of things about Trump- but they will not be able to get a conviction on anything. I am talking about Trump, not all those they squeezed around him. It's all about removing a dem nominee's political rival. Russia gate was, Jan 6 hearings are, and so is Lago-gate.
You do you but it refutes your talking points with actual statements made by Mueller in the context of his report.
Also, by your comment, you have failed to have a direct experience with sworn testimony that has come out of the hearings.
The FBI is in possession of restricted classified government documents that was discovered on Trump's property that have national security implications. He claimed that no other documents existed after retrieval of the first tranche.
Kushner's 2Bil deal with the Saudi's are cast in a completely different light.
Jailtime is certainly gonna be served by someone.
Your bottom line is based on false premises.
My bottom line is that after months/years of investing Trump on the Russia hoax- including but not limited to Mueller- he was not prosecuted for anything.
Let me know when that is not true.
It's getting repetitive, so I will let it rest.
I guess you want to beat this to death.
He was not prosecuted in any proceedings where he was subject to a finding of guilt under federal or statutory law, or would subject him to criminal penalties- the power of impeachment is limited to removal from office and the ability to bar holding future office.
In any case, you are just adding to my point. I listed various scam proceedings where Trump was subject to a politically motivated scam processes and nevertheless they did not get him. If you want to add two more examples of that by throwing in the impeachments, that's fine. There are two more examples. Did they get Trump in the end of those two scams? No.