Quote from Gabfly1:
That was not the intent. I specifically noted otherwise. And what do you think was the intent of the Right Wingers here who made no mention of the kid's behavior, focusing exclusively on the congressman? You think maybe they were just keeping to their narrative? How many of them at least acknowledged the kid's conduct? Which side owns the bias on this one?
It doesn't matter what the kid said, Unless he physically touched the scumbag congressman, or made a direct verbal threat, he did nothing worng. The kid was assualted for asking a question, period.
