Whether Donald Trump would win, I of course, wasn't sure that he would but, I still voted for him. Didn't see the wisdom of not voting then, the other side, would have gained 1 vote in favor of Hillary Clinton. Would have been better to vote so, my vote cancels 1 Hillary Clinton vote atleast. I am just saying these friends of mine are die hard liberal Democrats. Never discussed nor campaigned for Donald Trump. A lot of liberals said, they ended up voting for Donald Trump. I think with the booming economy, more jobs, less taxes, securing our borders, negotiating fair trade deals, there are more Democrats moving to his side. No sane individual would want Socialism and paying sky high taxes, liberals included.
Democrat debate tonight
- Thread starter UsualName
- Start date
Whether Donald Trump would win, I of course, wasn't sure that he would but, I still voted for him. Didn't see the wisdom of not voting then, the other side, would have gained 1 vote in favor of Hillary Clinton. Would have been better to vote so, my vote cancels 1 Hillary Clinton vote atleast. I am just saying these friends of mine are die hard liberal Democrats. Never discussed nor campaigned for Donald Trump. A lot of liberals said, they ended up voting for Donald Trump. I think with the booming economy, more jobs, less taxes, securing our borders, negotiating fair trade deals, there are more Democrats moving to his side. No sane individual would want Socialism and paying sky high taxes, liberals included.
And as I have said countless times, Rudy is the new Mannafort for the dems.
When you and Mueller could not make the big kill by bringing Trump down you assuaged yourself by focusing on all of the problems that you successfully created for Mannafort. And when the impeachment thing fails you will try to assuage yourself or divert from your failure by pretending that Rudy's problems are somehow an equivalency for bringing Trump down.
Michael Cohen, Michael Avenatti, Rudy Guiliani, etc. No one gives a fuck if you hang them all out on the National Mall or not.
You losers wanted this impeachment thing. Either do the deed and make the kill or be known as the pussies and failures that you are.
Man I hate when I see a Frog post, I feel even more stupid.
Make the kill, yeah tell that to Capone.
Make the kill, yeah tell that to Capone.
Lol.
Manafort = the swamp
Cohen= the swamp
Trump = the swamp
Pompeo = the swamp
Giuliani = the swamp
Sondland = the swamp
You can set your own parameters but decent people don’t respect it.
Romney and Collins went to lunch with Trump and there is all of this buzz about what it was about. I think it was about dismissing impeachment and Romney and Collins are not on board.
The house is doing its duty. Good for the house. The senate will most likely do its duty. Good for the senate. What the outcome is will be what it is.
Again, this is about standing up for the rule of law and the constitution. History is watching.
It is about trying to overturn the results of the last election and trying to remove trump so that he does not get re-elected.
Either do the deed or be known as pussies who failed undertook a failed witch-hunt.
I will tell you what, if we end up with president Pelosi then maybe you have a point. But at this juncture President Pence is not overturning the last election.
Also Trump coincidentally endorses a senate trial after lunch with Romney and Collins. Gee whiz.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/...-senate-trial-if-house-impeaches-trump-072578
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/...-senate-trial-if-house-impeaches-trump-072578
As I have said many times, the greater risk to the dems is not a dismissal but the opposite- that once the dems have decided to enter the lobster trap, they will not get out until Mitch lets them out. And that the Senate will shift over to using the impeachment hearing to process/review/advance incoming information from Horowitz and Durham as we go along.
You are going to get a two-fer for your money. You are going for the impeachment of Trump but are going to the impeachment of Joe as the Senate proceeds.
Yup, "should not immediately dismiss,"
"White House officials and Republican senators agreed the Senate should not immediately dismiss any articles of impeachment against the president."
Be careful Tards. You are not all that smart.
Oh did, I make two points again, knowing that you can only process one at a time?
The other point in my post was that the dems werer trying "to remove trump so that he does not get re-elected." Removing Trump and having Pence for the candidate or whoever the replacement would be is the other goal. Let's review this, but don't overload 1) remove trump to overturn the last election, and 2) remove trump for the next election. There that wasn't too heavy for ya was it?
You used that lobster trap story when trump shut down the government. That didn’t work out the way you thought it would now did it? Haha.