Democrat debate tonight

UsualName

UsualName

I don’t really have much commentary on this other than it’s basically Warren v. Biden and a bunch of backup singers hoping Warren and Biden fall off.

We’ll see if Biden can pull together enough complete sentences tonight. He has been getting better at this but still.

Hopefully someone drags Warren on the issues and her so called plans.

Tulsi and Castro are always wildcards. I’m still waiting for Yang to come out dressed up as Iceberg Slim.

And somewhere deep inside of me wants to see Klobuchar crush it.
 
Will any of them have the spine to call out Biden for his disgraceful and probably illegal conduct in Ukraine and China? Or will they continue to circle the wagons and pretend that he is a paragon of virtue and of course, Orange Man bad.
 
Steyer will have to do or say something highly controversial to announce his arrival as a well-funded bloviator and fly in the ointment.

I hate to say that because it causes the usual suspects to launch into a "he has no chance of being elected" routine, which of course has absolutely nothing to do with the point that I am making.

The two previous posts referred to the question of who could make or do wildcard comments, and my answer is that Steyer could be one.

I am looking forward to hearing more about record players from Joe. I just read right here on the forum from Usual Tard that "Joe has been getting better" although where and how no one knows. He has been getting better because they cut his time on the trail back about 80% to keep him from speaking. I guess that could be one way to "get better." Not sure that makes him the one to take the fight to Trump, but its their ground game- not mine.
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
Will any of them have the spine to call out Biden for his disgraceful and probably illegal conduct in Ukraine and China? Or will they continue to circle the wagons and pretend that he is a paragon of virtue and of course, Orange Man bad.
More...

Well if you’re looking for tabloid politics you’re looking in the wrong place for that. Now if you’re interested in Ukraine I hear there’s a lot of very interesting testimony and reporting on that of late.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Steyer will have to do or say something highly controversial to announce his arrival as a well-funded bloviator and fly in the ointment.

I hate to say that because it causes the usual suspects to launch into a "he has no chance of being elected" routine, which of course has absolutely nothing to do with the point that I am making.

The two previous posts referred to the question of who could make or do wildcard comments, and my answer is that Steyer could be one.

I am looking forward to hearing more about record players from Joe. I just read right here on the forum from Usual Tard that "Joe has been getting better" although where and how no one knows. He has been getting better because they cut his time on the trail back about 80% to keep him from speaking. I guess that could be one way to "get better." Not sure that makes him the one to take the fight to Trump, but its their ground game- not mine.
More...

Biden is going to gaffe but he also has a coherency problem. He needs to slow down and pick a few issues associated with the matter rather than trying to fit in all of the issues that may impact the matter.

But if that doesn’t work I’m sure we’ll get prolonged responses on the misunderstandings of San Francisco’s bath houses.
 
Tulsi Gabbard being in the debate might have something to say about it. Let us wait and see. What about Pocahontas Warren and Bernie Sanders, will they keep their mouths shut because Joe Biden told them to?
 
UsualName said:
Biden is going to gaffe but he also has a coherency problem. He needs to slow down and pick a few issues associated with the matter rather than trying to fit in all of the issues that may impact the matter.

But if that doesn’t work I’m sure we’ll get prolonged responses on the misunderstandings of San Francisco’s bath houses.
More...

Yes indeed. "associated with the matter" would be a big, big, big improvement.

Last time, he was asked a question about Afghanistan, and then launched into a boastful reminder and lecturette on why the issue being raised was why he advocated dividing the country into three or four countries. Ahhh, actually that was Iraq, Joe. Sorta like Afghanistan because they have people, camels, and fighting there. Yeh, we know Joe, they all look alike in the dark but you might want to study up a bit if you are aspiring to have your hands on the nuclear code someday. You don't want to fuck up and take out Moscow, Idaho.
 
UsualName said:
And somewhere deep inside of me wants to see Klobuchar crush it.
More...

I recall she has a high approval rating (home state) but nothing else, I'll have to watch the debate tonight, getting to that time where it is worth it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top