DELL 30" Ultra Sharp

Quote from traderdon56:

Saxon-

You won't need a 30" monitor to scalp 1/4 points off the ES!!!

Just having some fun with ya.. :)


Do not bring that episode back to the surface. I do not want to be called "little Adolf" again. As for that 1//4 of ES, let's just say the system had been modified somewhat........
:D :D :D :D
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

isn't two 19" monitors less expensive and more screen real estate?

Yes but you cannot get them up to the same resolution as the 30" one. Less resolution = higher strain on the eyes at least in my case.
 
Quote from gnome:

So you're asking if a picture of my dog Skippy will appear the same on each of 4 monitors? Then, NO.

With 4 monitors, you can have browser on one, market data on 2nd, charts on 3rd, porn on 4th... with 2 monitors, browser + data on #1, charts + porn on #2...whatever you want.
Or try this: porn on one, porn on 2nd, porn on 3rd, porn on 4th...scalping GOOG on PDA...
 
Quote from Tums:

you can't trade anyway, so what difference does it makes? ;-)>


Yes I cannot trade, but I am skillful at so many other things that not being able to trade does not make me feel inferior and consequently, I do not have a need to put other people down.
It makes a huge difference since I have to use my computer for my day work and my eyes are irreplaceable. Therefore, having the best monitor would be helpful, don't you think?

In conclusion, I much rather not be able to trade than to make silly grammar mistakes like you just made in your post.....
" what difference does it MAKES???? Shouldn't it be MAKE genius???? Too much time spend in front of charts using a cheap monitor I gather??????
 
Quote from LeonPhelps:

Or try this: porn on one, porn on 2nd, porn on 3rd, porn on 4th...scalping GOOG on PDA...
Oh, forgot....bluetooth with VR for hands-free experience...:cool:
 
here are different ways to skin the cat:

3007WFP $1,274
30" 2560x1600
total dots = 4,096,000
each dollar buys 3,215 dots
total surface area ~ 384 sq in
dots per sq in ~ 10,651
each sq in costs $3.31

2407WFP $719
24" 1920x1200
total dots = 2,304,000
each dollar buys 3,204 dots
total surface area ~ 246 sq in
dots per sq in ~ 9,361
each sq in costs $2.92

2007WFP $359
20" 1680x1050
total dots = 1,764,000
each dollar buys 4,914 dots
total surface area ~ 171 sq in
dots per sq in ~ 10,321
each sq in costs $2.10

E207WFP $260 (old model?)
20" 1680x1050
total dots = 1,764,000
each dollar buys 6,785 dots
total surface area ~ 171 sq in
dots per sq in ~ 10,321
each sq in costs $1.52

if you put 2x 24" together, you will get:

-- 492 sq in (28% more than 1x 30")
-- 4,096,000 dots (13% more than 1x 30")
-- costs $1,438 (13% more than 1x 30")


if you put 2x 20" together (cheap $260 model), you will get:

-- 341 sq in (89% of 1x 30")
-- 3,528,000 dots (86% of 1x 30")
-- costs $520 (41% of 1x 30")


other considerations not explored:
-- dot pitch size
-- image brightness
-- response time
-- color quality, etc.,
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

isn't two 19" monitors less expensive and more screen real estate?

no - less screen real estate. 2 x 24" lcds (side by side) are pretty wide. hate the wide format
 
I used to have 2x19" but what sucks about it is that basically the frames are in the center of your view and to me that's pretty annoying. So, now I have a 30" in the center and the 2 19" on the sides and am very happy with it.
Most of the people here never actually sat in front of a 30" and worked with it so their comments are pretty unqualified because it's an awesome experience working with it and I bet you'd like it, too.

IMG_3174.jpg
 
Back
Top