Deciphering Jack Analysis Bar by Bar ll

llIHeroic said:
Okay, so if T2F occurs, the next bar is tested for trend continuation. In order for this to occur, the volume on the next measurable bar needs to be bounded by T1 and T2F. This bar is labeled P3F.

So, we have P3F. A possible case of T2P to T2F to T2P exists, as quoted above. How do we get a second T2P without causing Ba? I can't understand how because T2P repeat would be greater than last T2P and less than P2, which is Ba Band Pass.
More...
Maybe jack will put down the shovel and throw us a bone (answers to a few of our recent unresolved questions) or two (some recent charts would be nice).
 
I also had a PP6 on bar 64 (1450). Again, I see the 3 T1s on your chart, but not the EE indicated. The 3 peaks and 3 troughs are my favorites so I guess I tend to see them.
 
smwbbe said:
Just my $0.02 as I've only looked through the beginning of your chart, but I had a PP6 on bar 8. You've got the 3 T1s noted, but not the PP6. Makes for a much better entry for the down bit which then produced a BO,T1 for me on bar 11.

But again - as I said - just my $0.02.
More...
Thanks for the feedback on my chart annotation.I'm trying hard to get the charts correct but there is so much to remember.I really do appreciate it ( I'm not kidding).Recently Heroic was kind enough to remind me of the internal "kills" rule that applies to some of the PPx's. So now i double check each time i get a PPx for this rule. I believe b6 was the kill (suppression) for the b5 thru b8 T1's.Same thing on b62 for the b61-64 T1's.
 
Speaking of errors on my chart.I think i just noticed one.B22 is an OB but it's in a second retro in a row.Realtime i remember annotating the OB as if it were not in retro because on b21 a long retro had just ended. Then i noticed the second retro but forgot to "undo" the two level assignment on the OB.Wow sometimes this stuff is super tough.It's seems my new annotations link back up on b36 again but have different annotations between b21 thru b36. http://screencast.com/t/MPaMRrL9Hs
 
Whole day revised.
 

Attachments

  • 1-29-14a.png
    1-29-14a.png
    114.8 KB · Views: 34
workwithus said:
SNIP
Thanks for the feedback on my chart annotation. I'm trying hard to get the charts correct but there is so much to remember.
Recently Heroic was kind enough to remind me of the internal "kills" rule that applies to some of the PPx's. So now i double check each time i get a PPx for this rule.
More...
I just checked the PP Sheet and see the annotation for an internal "KILLING" PP2, PP3, PP6 and PP6a. I guess I understand it for PP2 and PP3, but I don't for PP6 and PP6a. Internals are wait bars. Wait bars are more deceleration. I get it that it's a rule, I just don't quite understand the significance.
 
Has anyone ever seen a PP1b or PP1d ever annotated on any of jack's charts? I can't find one annotated anywhere.Maybe i missed the memo to ignore them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top