I have a methodology that I've been working with on the YM and NQ. It produces large winners, especially in the first and last hours of trading each day, but then in between, or even sometimes during those "good" hours," I get chopped to hell and I end up negative for the day (OEC demo account).
1) What does your "methodology" produce when the YM daily range is 50 pts or less? ahhhh, smell that summertime Jasmine.
The problem is I don't know when one of my signals is going to pan out and be a big winner, or when it's just BS. So my big winners are big (for me, trading 1 lot at a time), but sometimes they'll get to +$80 or +$150 or so and then reverse. I don't sell until I get my sell signal.
2) No-one, no-one, knows with 100% certainty if "this one" is a winner or loser, big or small, until after both sides of the trade have been executed and filled. However, we do know what triggered the signal, the win probability of such signal, and an average expectancy of such signal. Include day and time of day analysis of such signal and numerous other personal and market-condition variables. You have not done any of this. You are playing a video game.
Say in a given day I get 30 signals. Three might be winners (+$300 each) and 28 might be losers (-$30 each). So that's $600 - $840 = fail.
3) 10:1 risk management, with a 1:10 W/L ratio. Your methodology is performing perfectly! Getting nowhere fast, with the illusion of forward movement. Therein is the "cool" algorithm you seek.
BTW; your example... which is it, the textual 3/28, or your math, 2/28? The difference is success vs fail based solely on math.
Good trading
