Quote from IronFist:
So does anyone have any cool algorithms for solving this problem?
Quote from ssbc19:
Do you actually trade this or is it a program?
If all you had to do to make money is write a program to buy when price crosses above 60ema and sell when it crosses below we would all be rich.
And why not just program it because a computer would be a lot faster with the trades.
I think if you incorporated some analysis of the tick charts you could find better entries and exits
Quote from Aaron Copland:
Bingo, no trend stay out. This is were traders loose big time. They think they need to trade everyday.
Quote from NQscalper:
Not really true in all cases. I get killed in trends but do great in a choppy directionless market. It all depends on your trading style. If I had it my way, there would never be any trends longer then an hour.

Quote from Corey:
Perhaps try looking at inversion instead of cross-over (aka, when does the 60EMA hit an inversion point?)
I find this works well if you use two moving averages -- a long term one to define the trend, and a short term one to define the trade (this is similar to the Day-Trader 2.0 thread strategy,
Also, you should look to normalize for volatility somehow. This can be done by altering your stops or changing your entry methods (for example, using two trading moving averages and pyramiding your position).
Best of luck...
By the by, I think this works MUCH better with volume or range bars instead of time... [/B]
Inflection point, perhaps?Quote from IronFist:
What is an inversion point? Maybe i know it by another name.
BY volatility. Set your stops based on ATR. Analyze distance from moving averages based on ATR. Basically, change your strategy relative to volatility. More volatility means taking less risk on trend changes -- trends might not last as long.Quote from IronFist:
What do you mean by "normalize volatility?"