Debates!!!

[Brass]

Quote from Epic:

Couldn't find the full quote, but this is very close.



Newt is absolutely the posterboy for living your religion.

Gingrich is pathological. He makes up "facts" as he goes along. He is as self-unaware as Santorum, but with a pinch of evil.

 

[cgroupman]

Quote from Lucrum:

Disclaimer: The above opinion belongs to a non US citizen with no vote and no voice in US politics. It is posted solely for the purpose of demonstrating the posters unbridled haughty condescending arrogance and bears little if any resemblance to the opinions of most Americans. Should be read for entertainment purposes only.

Thank you

Oh come on, Mr. L. I think it bears resemblance to the opinions of many, if not most Americans. Several polls have Obama ahead of Newt or Mitt. Things may change, but in the vein of not speaking for others, or speaking in absolutes, nearly in this case, let's not say most when it's not really true. It may be in the future, I'll give you that.


c

 

[Brass]

In case of no legitimate counterargument, break glass:

Quote from Lucrum:

Disclaimer: The above opinion belongs to a non US citizen with no vote and no voice in US politics. It is posted solely for the purpose of demonstrating the posters unbridled haughty condescending arrogance and bears little if any resemblance to the opinions of most Americans. Should be read for entertainment purposes only.

Thank you

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Lucrum:

Disclaimer: The above opinion belongs to a non US citizen with no vote and no voice in US politics. It is posted solely for the purpose of demonstrating the posters unbridled haughty condescending arrogance and bears little if any resemblance to the opinions of most Americans. Should be read for entertainment purposes only.

Thank you

Disclaimer: The above poster believes that if a fool, the world's greatest fool even, says, "one plus one equals two", that the claim should be ignored or even derided, because a fool made it.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Ricter:

Disclaimer: The above poster believes that if a fool, the world's greatest fool even, says, "one plus one equals two", that the claim should be ignored or even derided, because a fool made it.

I think he meant to respond to you.

Quote from Brass:

In case of no legitimate counterargument, break glass:

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Lucrum:

I think he meant to respond to you.

Help me out, have you addressed the actual content of any threads recently, and I do refer to something more than "+1" or "Bingo!". If you have, I apologize, I'm not trying hard enough to acknowledge them.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Lucrum:

BINGO!

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Ricter:

Help me out, have you addressed the actual content of any threads recently, and I do refer to something more than "+1" or "Bingo!". If you have, I apologize, I'm not trying hard enough to acknowledge them.

I tell you what Ricky, point out some of your recently posted trades and I'll do a search of my posts to answer your question. We've covered this exact same ground before, a couple of times in fact. And you responded something to the effect of "fair enough". Nothing has changed since. So either post some trades, on this trading web site, or STFU about my content not being worthy.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

I think I liked you better when you were banned, the second time of course.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Lucrum:

I tell you what Ricky, point out some of your recently posted trades and I'll do a search of my posts to answer your question. We've covered this exact same ground before, a couple of times in fact. And you responded something to the effect of "fair enough". Nothing has changed since. So either post some trades, on this trading web site, or STFU about my content not being worthy.

Disclaimer: if a non-trader says, "one plus one equals two", on a "politics and religion" subdomain under a trading top-level domain, then ignore or deride the statement--it is suspect without examination.