Covid Vaccine Scam, Ivermectin is the cure (Compilation)

ph1l said:
The funding isn't directly from Johnson & Johnson but instead the related Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
https://www.factcheck.org/covid-misconceptions/
More...

Yes link from RT mentions this plus more,

Page 39 Elite Trade_2021-08-01_17-47-00.png


ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION.png

ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUND.png

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/institutional-portfolio/robert-wood-johnson-foundation-49083
 
Last edited:
Once again... the shit you are posting.... is dated and stale and you know it.
Respond properly.

An honest person would say... true there are a few positive small studies... but they may be flawed... and one of them has been called fraudulent and taken down.

gwb-trading said:
Once again... Not only are these studies being promoted by Ivermectin pimps fabricated. Many on based on fake data where not a single patient was involved in the study -- these clowns made the entire study up -- In other words the entire study is imaginary.

As noted in the articles below -- it has reach the point where it is clear that science is vulnerable to complete fraud and it is time to take firms measures to stop the abuse of science from Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine fraudsters.

Let's take a look at some further information on this situation below...

Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns
The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data
https://www.theguardian.com/science...vid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns

Large Ivermectin Study Retracted
— Preprint publisher finds evidence of plagiarism, problems with raw data
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/93658

No surprise here -- dozens of "studies" pimping Ivermectin are misleading and false. In fact just about every study pushing Ivermectin as beneficial for preventing or treating COVID-19 is fabricated nonsense.
Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19
https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111678

Yes... nearly every study showing Ivermectin is effective at preventing or treating COVID-19 is completely fraudulent.
Ivermectin COVID-19 Scandal Shows How Vulnerable Science Is to Fraud
https://www.sciencealert.com/iverme...ge-wake-up-call-for-fraud-in-covid-19-science

Let's see what the manufacturer of Ivermectin, Merck, has to say...
Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

KENILWORTH, N.J., Feb. 4, 2021 – Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:
  • No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
  • No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
  • A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.
More...
 
jem said:
Once again... the shit you are posting.... is dated and stale and you know it.
Respond properly.

An honest person would say... true there are a few positive small studies... but they may be flawed... and one of them has been called fraudulent and taken down.
More...

The information outlines the recent and wholesale fraud in “studies” pushing Ivermectin for Covid by shady individuals undermining medical science. Respectable scientists are calling foul on this nonsense and demanding it stops.
 
Van_der_Voort_4 said:
The upside is that people dumb enough to take an experimental radical gene therapy are less likely to reproduce .
sm-%20bang%20own%20head%20with%20mallet.gif
More...

They initially predicted a baby boom because people were locked up or under strict restrictions...there was nothing else to do except to do a lot of fucking.

Then reality set in quickly. People became short temper, more hostile, depressed, fewer hook-ups because of fear that the other person may have Covid. Simply, the Covid Pandemic has not been good for romance nor good for a person's sex life.

Now that countries are removing strict restrictions, slowly opening up borders, fewer stresses on sexual relationships, kids getting ready to go back to school, young adults returning back to universities while Vaccines are being distributed...
  • I wouldn't be surprised if there's a baby boom by year-end and not because of vaccines. It will be because people are getting back to fucking without the stress of a Pandemic. :D
P.S. Neighbor (52 years old) and fully vaccinated...knocked up his 35-year-old girlfriend that's also fully vaccinated. She found out last week that she was pregnant.

This guy's libido never missed a hole even when vaccinated. :cool:
The people that should be worried about their sperm counts are the unvaccinated that get Covid even if its mild.
#maleinfertilitydebunked

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
It's true of many viral infections have a tendency to hang around in the testes long after the symptoms of infection have disappeared.
The University of Miami is conducting research on the issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top