COVID-19 conspiracy thread....who released it?

which tinfoil hat do you choose

  • official story (cross-species transfer)

    Votes: 6 21.4%

  • accidental release of virus

    Votes: 10 35.7%

  • accidental release of bioweapon

    Votes: 3 10.7%

  • intentional release of bioweapon (China)

    Votes: 5 17.9%

  • intentional release of bioweapon (USA)

    Votes: 3 10.7%

  • intentional release of bioweapon (Russia)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • intentional release of bioweapon (terrorists)

    Votes: 1 3.6%
  • Total voters
    28
New conspiracy:

CIA released COVID to tank the economy & deter the reelection of the most dangerous enemy to the country
 
Why release it at home? Plausible deniability? No, that’s retarded. Was SARS a bioweapon? These theories only occur when the virus jumps and establishes new hot zones. Too stupid to debate.
 
PoopyDeek said:
Why release it at home? Plausible deniability? No, that’s retarded. Was SARS a bioweapon? These theories only occur when the virus jumps and establishes new hot zones. Too stupid to debate.
More...

consider this thread a containment zone for the stupid.

Plus I like to poke holes at theories....staring with my own (see OP).
 
elderado said:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/irans-...-root-of-its-coronavirus-outbreak-11583940683
More...

Yup. as I said in a post a couple/few days ago, "the virus has the Iranians working full time for it." - referring to the fact that their holy center/town/shrine whatever was a source of a lethal strain of the virus but instead of closing down the city, people were being invited to continue to come by thousands from all over the country and then take it back to their village. Doesn't get any better than that if you are a virus trying to dominate the entire region/world. Conquering the world, one dumphuk at a time.

I noticed that the first case they had in New York was a woman who had flown in from Iran. We dont need anyone from Iran coming in to the country. Iran is fully committed to the spread of the virus- either intentionally or through dumphuckery. Either way. Slam the door shut. Thank you Mr. Trump. Let Don Lemon cry all he wants.
 
I think a bioweapon would be hyper-contagious and very lethal. Who would bother with a 2-5% mortality?

I believe the original game-market story.

A bat virus makes sense because they usually come out and say if something is swine related or avian and I haven't heard anything like that. Bats are mammals so maybe that is the problem.
 
Snarkhund said:
I think a bioweapon would be hyper-contagious and very lethal. Who would bother with a 2-5% mortality?

I believe the original game-market story.

A bat virus makes sense because they usually come out and say if something is swine related or avian and I haven't heard anything like that. Bats are mammals so maybe that is the problem.
More...

I addressed the lethality in the OP. Not all weapons are made to kill, some are made to maim or cripple. If you wanted to exert control over HK rioters by imposing martial law for instance, if you wanted to spare the children, if you wanted to bring your enemy to heel w/o having mutually assured destruction, if you wanted some plausible deniability, etc, etc....

Having said all that, the forensics still support the wet market theory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top