The purpose of the investigation was NEVER to second guess if it was appropriate to charge Clinton. OIG specifically stated this in their January 12, 2017 memorandum announcing this review and they reiterated it in the report. OIG also stated that not second guessing does not equal an endorsement. This judgment was not in Comey's lane and it certainly isn't in the OIG's.Your claim is beyond ridiculous.Well Horowitz is the last line of review and he agreed that according to the law, the prosecutors and department history it was not appropriate to charge Clinton.
Anyone interested in fact checking leftist lies and propaganda can download the OIG report from the DOJ website in searchable PDF format here:
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
