There’s more to come from you but that will be about it. Party’s over.
Okay, so Horowitz will not be appearing before the Committee then, because his review is the last review?
There’s more to come from you but that will be about it. Party’s over.
Alright, I accept that but am still piecing it together. It may be that I heard roundabout that the House Intel Committee had uncovered it rather than the IG - see link- which would raise my same question but via a different source.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/hillary-clinton-email-accessed-foreign-actors/
Alright, I accept that but am still piecing it together. It may be that I heard roundabout that the House Intel Committee had uncovered it rather than the IG - see link- which would raise my same question but via a different source.
Perhaps this will come up at the House Intel Committee meeting. Oh wait. You just informed me that there is no more review by anyone, anywhere. Horowitz just tells them how it is.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/hillary-clinton-email-accessed-foreign-actors/
Okay, so Horowitz will not be appearing before the Committee then, because his review is the last review?
Is this the same House panel that is a lapdog for Trump, or a different one?
Ok so a bunch of Trump lapdogs are going to get a few bites at Horowitz in an election year. Why is this any different than when Clinton testified for Benghazi?
I am prepared to see evidence by any committee that alleges that that hillary's emails were accessed. Unlike you, I will not check their party affiliation first.
Speaking of Rosenstein- I know you knew it was bad news for you when he wasn’t half way around the world but delivering the report to Trump himself.
Yeah. You answered a whataboutism with a whataboutism with another whataboutism.
Notice something?
Yeah. You answered a whataboutism with a whataboutism with another whataboutism.
Are you going for a record?