Countdown to Horowitz beginning

Yowzer.

I have only read headlines today because I have been out and about. One of the article headlines was that Trump was pissed about Fox giving Comey softball questions. Maybe he was referring to previous Fox interviews with Comey, not sure.

But I just watched the Comey interview from today- and Holy Shiite- COMEY THE CLOWN FAIL!!!!!!!!!!

No doubt Trump wanted to see more blood, I know I always do, but Chris Wallace really did not cut him much slack and Comey failed on each and every question bigtime. And his face looked like his hemorrhoids were about to explode rather than this victory lap crap he has been attempting lately.

Not lookin good there Director Clown.
 
Tony Stark said:
Hes not facing jail time like Trump and Rudy
More...
Trump is facing jail time for what? Are you referring to obstruction with respect to Mueller investigation.

If yes and you think that is true, why didn't the dems include that in articles of impeachment?
 
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...firing_for_rogue_officials_who_targeted_trump

Voters Favor Jail, Firing for Rogue Officials Who Targeted Trump

Voters are ready to jail or fire senior law enforcement officials who illegally targeted President Trump, but most think they are unlikely to be punished.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone and online survey finds that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely that senior federal law enforcement officials broke the law in an effort to prevent Trump from winning the presidency.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
Among other people, ask Michael Cohen. Maybe he has an idea.
More...
According to most of the libtards on this forum, if Trump is not reelected, it is a fact that he will be indicted for obstruction regarding Mueller investigation.

If that is true and it is such a slam dunk due to overwhelming evidence, why didn't Dems include it in articles of impeachment?
 
WeToddDid2 said:
According to pretty most of the libtards on this forum, if Trump is not reelected, it is a forgone conclusion and fact that he will be indicted for obstruction regarding Mueller investigation. If it is such a slam dunk, why didn't Dems include it in articles of impeachment?
More...
Because they didn't have to. Because it's a slam dunk as impeachable offenses go.

The senate, a Trump subsidiary, will acquit him regardless of the charges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRS
TreeFrogTrader said:
Oh I dunno about the extra-judicial thing.

He was held in Britain because the Swedes submitted an extradition request . The brits held him on bail and he skipped so they gave him a year of jail time there before releasing him to anyone. And the U.S. has a warrant out for him on an espionage crime. Those are all basic judicial criminal law proceedings. He is still in Britain and gets hearings quite regularly on all of his various issues.

His situation deteriorated when El Salvador booted him out of their embassy. Which was not just coincidently right after Trump talked to them about their foreign aid.
More...
He was not in the Salvadoran embassy. He is being held with no charges. He hasn't had an extradition hearing as there are no formal charges.
 
Last edited:
Snarkhund said:
He was not in the Salvadoran embassy. He is being held with no charges. He hasn't had an extradition hearing as there are no formal charges.
More...

Yeh, I meant Eduadoran.

But he is being held by the Brits right now for jumping bail which is not an extra-judicial process. It is part of their criminal law.

And he has not had a final, formal extradition hearing to the United States, at HIS request, because he has asked the court for more time and delay to gather evidence.

I am not up on his case of late so can adjust my thinking quite easily with more information, but I have not seen any evidence that he is being held "extra-judicially" as in some type of gitmo arrangement.

The brits are holding him for jumping bail. That is a criminal charge. The plan was to process his extradtion request while he was being held on the bail jumping. Whether he is now being held just on the extradtion request because he has finished his year long bail jumping sentence, I don't know. Either way, those are both legal reasons for holding him.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top