Coronavirus: Boris Johnson moved to intensive care as symptoms worsen

FrankInLa said:
...you are exactly setting up a pissing context in many of your posts. You do realize that, right? Just a gentle pointer...
More...
I can't control how someone responds to a post pointing out something as boring and non-controversial as the probability distribution of chapter 7 bankruptcies/liquidations, sorry.
 
that was not the point of my post to you at all. Too thick. Nevermind, just forget it.

Sig said:
I can't control how someone responds to a post pointing out something as boring and non-controversial as the probability distribution of chapter 7 bankruptcies/liquidations, sorry.
More...
 
FrankInLa said:
that was not the point of my post to you at all. Too thick. Nevermind, just forget it.
More...
When you call someone "too thick" it's generally not a "gentle pointer" and pretty indicative of someone trying to piss someone else off. Would you really say that to me if we were (I know hard to imagine, but post COVID) sitting in a coffee shop face to face and expect that we would consider a civil conversation afterward?
I understood perfectly what you were saying, I simply disagreed with you. If someone flies off the handle in response to a post stating something as boring and non-controversial as chapter 7 outcomes, I maintain that it's really inappropriate to blame the person who posted the chapter 7 outcomes for the actions of the guy who flew off the handle. That's akin to blaming the wife for her husband beating her because she didn't kowtow to him. Should I carefully couch all my comments in loving, non-judgemental, as some people like to say "safe space" terms to ensure they don't trip off line in response to my posts? Perhaps, I can certainly try to do a better job of that. Am I in any way to blame when someone trips offline at something as silly as this if I fail to do that? I don't think so.
 
now you got the point. That is exactly what you did and often do in your posts. Self-reflection time. I truly just wanted to point you to it, no ill wishes.

Sig said:
When you call someone "too thick" it's
generally not a "gentle pointer" and pretty indicative of someone trying to piss someone else off. Would you really say that to me if we were (I know hard to imagine, but post COVID) sitting in a coffee shop face to face and expect that we would consider a civil conversation afterward?
I understood perfectly what you were saying, I simply disagreed with you. If someone flies off the handle in response to a post stating something as boring and non-controversial as chapter 7 outcomes, I maintain that it's really inappropriate to blame the person who posted the chapter 7 outcomes for the actions of the guy who flew off the handle. That's akin to blaming the wife for her husband beater her because she didn't kowtow to him. Should I carefully couch all my comments in loving, non-judgemental, as some people like to say "safe space" terms to ensure they don't trip off line in response to my posts? Perhaps, I can certainly try to do a better job of that. Am I in any way to blame when someone trips offline at something as silly as this if I fail to do that? I don't think so.
More...
 
FrankInLa said:
Checked your post history and you seem to have serious issues staying factual and understanding the point others make. I don't put anyone on ignore who has different opinions, that would isolate myself from adverse thoughts. But i can't stand someone who constantly willfully misinterprets what others said. On ignore.
More...

I replied to your quotes and addressed your points. Learn to read.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top