It was not a lucky guess. Pretty straight forward analysis with data that was publicly available at the time.
Except for the fact the COVID death rate (CFR) is three times what you are claiming.
It was not a lucky guess. Pretty straight forward analysis with data that was publicly available at the time.
Except for the fact the COVID death rate (CFR) is three times what you are claiming.
If you truly are a trader then I hope your trading style is different than your argumentation style. You are on a loser here and you can't seem to let go.
How many accounts have you blown up?
Even a .6% death rate is high for what is now and endemic disease that will have annual resurgences regardless of vaccines. Further, the impact of the 14 to 15% of severe, long term Covid outcomes will be even more impactful on our society going forward.
Strawman, get lost.
There was no data that gave you an accurate range to narrow it down to .1%. That data doesn’t exist to this day. There’s plenty of asymptomatic and people with minor symptoms who aren’t getting tested. There are models, but all of the ones I’ve seen have estimates multiples apart from the upper to the lower bounds.It was not a lucky guess. Pretty straight forward analysis with data that was publicly available at the time.
That all you got? You might as well as lay down and die on this issue if you are not going to bother challenging my supported position.
There was no data that gave you an accurate range to narrow it down to .1%. .
So as new data comes in we still have the stellar call by Wildchild. Using data to make predictions to make huge profits is what I do.
"Fauci and other public health experts have since put the COVID-19 death rate at about 0.6% -- six times that of a typical flu season -- which is the latest CDC projection."