And so would the cop's job have been merely to provide this information to the group and then be on his way, or might his obligation include the elimination of the potential hazard until such time as the necessary hardware was on hand and in place to properly tether the sign? Was the sign destroyed, or was it merely removed after the cop initially, and repeatedly, requested its removal?Quote from chuck.ells:
This is what happens when you give a gun and uniform to dumb fucks.
The "PIG" was obviously attempting to force his politics onto the sign holders.
For those of you who are concerend about the potential risk of falling, any adult living in the northwest has learned the value of a tether.
As far as I can see from the vid, thats the only brain fart displayed by the sign holders. The "PIG" could've turned into a "COP" by pointing that out to them.
It seems some people's freedom is threatened the moment they can't get into someone else's face "just because." True, police should not overstep their authority. However, civilians should not disregard that authority simply as a matter of course.
