Cooling for 58 years... based on raw NOAA data!

jem said:
you are lower than troll, perhaps a trog/troll. I present as a possible theory something AGW nutters have used to explain the pause. (many say it was due to aerosols.) and you don't even recognize your team's speculations.

as I said on the other thread... you actually desire to be a repugnant troll don't you.
More...


jem, you detestable liar, it's the fucking greenhouse effect and you know it you fucking liar/lawyer (same thing). Go fuck yourself.
 
really... it not greenhouse theory... its greenhouse fact...

you know its not Ozone
you know its not aerosols
you know its not water vapor
you know its not the elimination of the some of the gases your industry created?
you know its not any other part of the environment or the sun.

You absolutely know that its greenhouse effect.
you have no mind for uncertainty in science.
you are the drone george orwell warns about.

wow... I have a question... how many papers can you find in which the scientists say for sure its the greenhouse effect that causes stratospheric cooling... can you present a few links, I would like to read them. I know one from a hundred years ago that made that prediction... but are there other scientists who have your religious certainty?








futurecurrents said:
jem, you detestable liar, it's the fucking greenhouse effect and you know it you fucking liar/lawyer (same thing). Go fuck yourself.
More...
 
The raw data shows no warming therefore the assignment of cause to human activity is moot.

There is no global warming so there can be no human caused global warming. See how that works?
 
futurecurrents said:
Sorry. He's back on ignore. Serves me right for taking him off. Problem is that I don't want his lies to go uncorrected.
More...
upload_2016-3-15_17-26-24.png


Look at it this way. If scat can have over 300 people on his ignore list no one can criticize you for having a couple on yours.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top