Conservatives: Always on the wrong side of history.

[mrbill]

Quote from RCG Trader:

That is why they come here mrbill. To vent, one of their own even admitted as much.

Still it is amazing to see this stuff.

I guess that could explain it. They can congregate here, beat their chests with their own kind. They could never get away with it in the real world, thank Goodness for that.

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from PiggyBank:

No, but my original point was: providing for equality of employment is not a power that the fed govt possesses. establishing equality in the eyes of the law, is. Again AA wasn't right then and isn't right now.

but if the argument you're going with is there wasn't legal equality before the exec order (law?) was passed, then why was it necessary after the act of 64, and why is it necessary now?

I see that you are a reasonable man. Equality of opportunity is all the feds can ever really do.

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from mrbill:

I guess that could explain it. They can congregate here, beat their chests with their own kind. They could never get away with it in the real world, thank Goodness for that.

Prejudice--"The result of a childhood immersed in an atmosphere of bigotry so complete that it was almost invisible, so entire that you accepted it's axioms as second nature"......Issac Asimov.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Did you really just type that?

Have you lost what little mind you have left?

I'm sorry what part of that bothers you?

You think my reasoning is flawed or is it you just find my conclusion unpalatable?


Don't get me wrong It's an absolute imperative that we all be treated equally under the law but that's not the issue.
Got something to say mr bill : Go ahead spit it out, splain to me how I'm incorrect in my conclusion?

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I'm sorry what part of that bothers you?

You think my reasoning is flawed or is it you just find my conclusion unpalatable?


Don't get me wrong It's an absolute imperative that we all be treated equally under the law but that's not the issue.
Got something to say mr bill : Go ahead spit it out, splain to me how I'm incorrect in my conclusion?

That would require a complete re-education on your part. But I willing to do it, in segments.

Which segment shall we take on first?

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from RCG Trader:

That would require a complete re-education on your part. But I willing to do it, in segments.

Which segment shall we take on first?

You start by answering one of the questions numbnuts.


(please don't tell me I have to argue your case on your behalf too)

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

You start by answering one of the questions numbnuts.


(please don't tell me I have to argue your case on your behalf too)

Im sorry, I am just a slow negro. Could you please restate the question in a way that even I can understand?

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Im sorry, I am just a slow negro. Could you please restate the question in a way that even I can understand?

I'm sorry what part of that bothers you?

You think my reasoning is flawed or is it you just find my conclusion unpalatable?

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I'm sorry what part of that bothers you?

You think my reasoning is flawed or is it you just find my conclusion unpalatable?

What part of what, sir. Break it down for me.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from RCG Trader:

What part of what, sir. Break it down for me.

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I got sad news for ya rcg, you folks probably won't ever be equal, biologically speaking it just doesn't seem to be in the cards.

Look on the bright side maybe this global warming thing is the ecological edge you folks need so desperately.

Cause liberalism and it's impoverised environment sure ain't workin fer ya.