Okay. I think we are getting somewhere now.

http://iotwreport.com/roy-moores-signature-discovered-on-another-controversial-document/
http://iotwreport.com/roy-moores-signature-discovered-on-another-controversial-document/
This is actually funny. So you don’t have to click the link:Okay. I think we are getting somewhere now.
http://iotwreport.com/roy-moores-signature-discovered-on-another-controversial-document/
Just going to do a shameless "I told you so" here for a second.
Y'all may recall that in one of the beacoup posts in this or another thread I said that you gotta be nuts if you don't think this tsunami of harassment complaints coming out of the woodwork now is not - in a major way even if not completely- related to Hillary and Bubba being gone now. As I said, all the harassment issues created an uncomfortable inconvenient atmosphere for Hillary to have to deal with. She definitely avoided like the plague any situation where as a feminist or candidate she would be required to take a lead in condemning something because it immediately led to the "what about bill" questions. And all the bootlicking lib women kept their mouths shut and kept things safe for her.
Okay, enough of that. That is just background to my question. Do you think Kirtsten Gillibrand- an ultra lib who took Hillary's seat in the Senate- would be making ballsy statements like this if Hillary were in the White House right now. IF THERE IS A TARD HERE WHO BELIEVES THAT, THEN SAY SO. DONT BE SHY.
Hillary was an enabler. She covered for Bill and then made sure that any lib who went too close to the issue of harassment might end out having an accident or a shortened career.
So that we don't forget the question, I am asking whether Gillibrand would be saying this if Hillary were in office now.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/16/kirsten-gillibrand-bill-clinton-resign-lewinsky-246532
It's a southern thing.